The patch titled Subject: proc: save LOC in __xlate_proc_name() has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is proc-save-loc-in-__xlate_proc_name.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/proc-save-loc-in-__xlate_proc_name.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/proc-save-loc-in-__xlate_proc_name.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: proc: save LOC in __xlate_proc_name() Can't look at this verbosity anymore. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YFYXAp/fgq405qcy@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/proc/generic.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/fs/proc/generic.c~proc-save-loc-in-__xlate_proc_name +++ a/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -166,15 +166,8 @@ static int __xlate_proc_name(const char const char *cp = name, *next; struct proc_dir_entry *de; - de = *ret; - if (!de) - de = &proc_root; - - while (1) { - next = strchr(cp, '/'); - if (!next) - break; - + de = *ret ?: &proc_root; + while ((next = strchr(cp, '/'))) { de = pde_subdir_find(de, cp, next - cp); if (!de) { WARN(1, "name '%s'\n", name); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx are proc-save-loc-in-__xlate_proc_name.patch proc-mandate-proc_lseek-in-struct-proc_ops.patch proc-delete-redundant-subset=pid-check.patch proc-test-subset=pid.patch