The patch titled
Subject: MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT
Patch series "kernel-doc and MAINTAINERS clean-up".
Roughly 900 warnings of about 21.000 kernel-doc warnings in the kernel
tree warn with 'cannot understand function prototype:', i.e., the
kernel-doc parser cannot parse the function's signature. The majority,
about 600 cases of those, are just struct definitions following the
kernel-doc description. Further, spot-check investigations suggest that
the authors of the specific kernel-doc descriptions simply were not aware
that the general format for a kernel-doc description for a structure
requires to prefix the struct name with the keyword 'struct', as in
'struct struct_name - Brief description.'. Details on kernel-doc are at
the Link below.
Without the struct keyword, kernel-doc does not check if the kernel-doc
description fits to the actual struct definition in the source code.
Fortunately, in roughly a quarter of these cases, the kernel-doc
description is actually complete wrt. its corresponding struct
definition. So, the trivial change adding the struct keyword will allow
us to keep the kernel-doc descriptions more consistent for future changes,
by checking for new kernel-doc warnings.
Also, some of the files in ./include/ are not assigned to a specific
MAINTAINERS section and hence have no dedicated maintainer. So, if
needed, the files in ./include/ are also assigned to the fitting
MAINTAINERS section, as I need to identify whom to send the clean-up patch
anyway.
Here is the change from this kernel-doc janitorial work in the ./include/
directory for MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
This patch (of 2):
Commit a520110e4a15 ("mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h")
adds a new file in ./include/linux, but misses to update MAINTAINERS
accordingly. Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl
./include/linux/pagewalk.h points only to lkml as general fallback for all
files, whereas the original ./include/linux/mm.h clearly marks this file
part of MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
Assign ./include/linux/pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-2-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/MAINTAINERS~maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management
+++ a/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11557,6 +11557,7 @@ F: include/linux/gfp.h
F: include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
F: include/linux/mm.h
F: include/linux/mmzone.h
+F: include/linux/pagewalk.h
F: include/linux/vmalloc.h
F: mm/
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx are
maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch
pagewalk-prefix-struct-kernel-doc-descriptions.patch
