The patch titled
Subject: x86/vmemmap: drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Subject: x86/vmemmap: drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range
Patch series "Cleanup and fixups for vmemmap handling", v4.
This series contains cleanups to remove dead code that handles unaligned
cases for 4K and 1GB pages (patch#1 and patch#2) when removing the vemmmap
range, and a fix (patch#3) to handle the case when two vmemmap ranges
intersect the same PMD.
This patch (of 3):
remove_pte_table() is prepared to handle the case where either the start
or the end of the range is not PAGE aligned. This cannot actually happen:
__populate_section_memmap enforces the range to be PMD aligned, so as long
as the size of the struct page remains multiple of 8, the vmemmap range
will be aligned to PAGE_SIZE.
Drop the dead code and place a VM_BUG_ON in vmemmap_{populate,free} to
catch nasty cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301083230.30924-1-osalvador@xxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301083230.30924-2-osalvador@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 50 +++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c~x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range
+++ a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -962,7 +962,6 @@ remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsig
{
unsigned long next, pages = 0;
pte_t *pte;
- void *page_addr;
phys_addr_t phys_addr;
pte = pte_start + pte_index(addr);
@@ -983,42 +982,15 @@ remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsig
if (phys_addr < (phys_addr_t)0x40000000)
return;
- if (PAGE_ALIGNED(addr) && PAGE_ALIGNED(next)) {
- /*
- * Do not free direct mapping pages since they were
- * freed when offlining, or simplely not in use.
- */
- if (!direct)
- free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
-
- spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
- pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
- spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
-
- /* For non-direct mapping, pages means nothing. */
- pages++;
- } else {
- /*
- * If we are here, we are freeing vmemmap pages since
- * direct mapped memory ranges to be freed are aligned.
- *
- * If we are not removing the whole page, it means
- * other page structs in this page are being used and
- * we canot remove them. So fill the unused page_structs
- * with 0xFD, and remove the page when it is wholly
- * filled with 0xFD.
- */
- memset((void *)addr, PAGE_INUSE, next - addr);
-
- page_addr = page_address(pte_page(*pte));
- if (!memchr_inv(page_addr, PAGE_INUSE, PAGE_SIZE)) {
- free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
+ if (!direct)
+ free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
- spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
- pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
- spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
- }
- }
+ spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+ pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
+ spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+
+ /* For non-direct mapping, pages means nothing. */
+ pages++;
}
/* Call free_pte_table() in remove_pmd_table(). */
@@ -1197,6 +1169,9 @@ remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, un
void __ref vmemmap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
{
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE));
+
remove_pagetable(start, end, false, altmap);
}
@@ -1556,6 +1531,9 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned
{
int err;
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE));
+
if (end - start < PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct page))
err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, NULL);
else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from osalvador@xxxxxxx are
x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-4k-unaligned-vmemmap-range.patch
x86-vmemmap-drop-handling-of-1gb-vmemmap-ranges.patch
x86-vmemmap-handle-unpopulated-sub-pmd-ranges.patch
