[patch 046/118] mm: zswap: clean up confusing comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: zswap: clean up confusing comment

Correct wording and change one duplicated word (it) to "it is".

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201221042848.13980-1-rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 0ab0abcf5115 ("mm/zswap: refactor the get/put routines")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/zswap.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/zswap.c~mm-zswap-clean-up-confusing-comment
+++ a/mm/zswap.c
@@ -1022,10 +1022,10 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct
 
 	/*
 	* if we get here due to ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST
-	* a load may happening concurrently
-	* it is safe and okay to not free the entry
+	* a load may be happening concurrently.
+	* it is safe and okay to not free the entry.
 	* if we free the entry in the following put
-	* it it either okay to return !0
+	* it is also okay to return !0
 	*/
 fail:
 	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux