[patch 170/173] hugetlbfs: correct some obsolete comments about inode i_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: hugetlbfs: correct some obsolete comments about inode i_mutex

Since commit 9902af79c01a ("parallel lookups: actual switch to rwsem"),
i_mutex of inode is converted to i_rwsem. So replace i_mutex with i_rwsem
to make comments up to date.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210127093111.36672-1-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c~hugetlbfs-correct-some-obsolete-comments-about-inode-i_mutex
+++ a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_punch_hole(struct
 
 		inode_lock(inode);
 
-		/* protected by i_mutex */
+		/* protected by i_rwsem */
 		if (info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) {
 			inode_unlock(inode);
 			return -EPERM;
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int hugetlbfs_setattr(struct user
 
 		if (newsize & ~huge_page_mask(h))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		/* protected by i_mutex */
+		/* protected by i_rwsem */
 		if ((newsize < oldsize && (info->seals & F_SEAL_SHRINK)) ||
 		    (newsize > oldsize && (info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW)))
 			return -EPERM;
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux