The patch titled
Subject: sysctl.c: fix underflow value setting risk in vm_table
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
sysctlc-fix-underflow-value-setting-risk-in-vm_table.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/sysctlc-fix-underflow-value-setting-risk-in-vm_table.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/sysctlc-fix-underflow-value-setting-risk-in-vm_table.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lin Feng <linf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: sysctl.c: fix underflow value setting risk in vm_table
Apart from subsystem specific .proc_handler handler, all ctl_tables with
extra1 and extra2 members set should use proc_dointvec_minmax instead of
proc_dointvec, or the limit set in extra* never work and potentially echo
underflow values(negative numbers) is likely make system unstable.
Especially vfs_cache_pressure and zone_reclaim_mode, -1 is apparently not
a valid value, but we can set to them. And then kernel may crash.
# echo -1 > /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201223105535.2875-1-linf@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c~sysctlc-fix-underflow-value-setting-risk-in-vm_table
+++ a/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2962,7 +2962,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.data = &block_dump,
.maxlen = sizeof(block_dump),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
},
{
@@ -2970,7 +2970,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.data = &sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure,
.maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
},
#if defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT) || \
@@ -2980,7 +2980,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.data = &sysctl_legacy_va_layout,
.maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_legacy_va_layout),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
},
#endif
@@ -2990,7 +2990,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.data = &node_reclaim_mode,
.maxlen = sizeof(node_reclaim_mode),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
},
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linf@xxxxxxxxxx are
sysctlc-fix-underflow-value-setting-risk-in-vm_table.patch
