The patch titled
Subject: mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock
Since we changed the pgdat->lru_lock to lruvec->lru_lock, it's time to fix
the incorrect comments in code. Also fixed some zone->lru_lock comment
error from ancient time. etc.
I struggled to understand the comment above move_pages_to_lru() (surely
it never calls page_referenced()), and eventually realized that most of
it had got separated from shrink_active_list(): move that comment back.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1604566549-62481-20-git-send-email-alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst | 15 ----
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst | 23 ++----
Documentation/trace/events-kmem.rst | 2
Documentation/vm/unevictable-lru.rst | 22 ++---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 2
include/linux/mmzone.h | 3
mm/filemap.c | 4 -
mm/rmap.c | 4 -
mm/vmscan.c | 41 ++++++-----
9 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memcg_test.rst
@@ -133,18 +133,9 @@ Under below explanation, we assume CONFI
8. LRU
======
- Each memcg has its own private LRU. Now, its handling is under global
- VM's control (means that it's handled under global pgdat->lru_lock).
- Almost all routines around memcg's LRU is called by global LRU's
- list management functions under pgdat->lru_lock.
-
- A special function is mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(). This scans
- memcg's private LRU and call __isolate_lru_page() to extract a page
- from LRU.
-
- (By __isolate_lru_page(), the page is removed from both of global and
- private LRU.)
-
+ Each memcg has its own vector of LRUs (inactive anon, active anon,
+ inactive file, active file, unevictable) of pages from each node,
+ each LRU handled under a single lru_lock for that memcg and node.
9. Typical Tests.
=================
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst
@@ -287,20 +287,17 @@ When oom event notifier is registered, e
2.6 Locking
-----------
- lock_page_cgroup()/unlock_page_cgroup() should not be called under
- the i_pages lock.
+Lock order is as follows:
- Other lock order is following:
-
- PG_locked.
- mm->page_table_lock
- pgdat->lru_lock
- lock_page_cgroup.
-
- In many cases, just lock_page_cgroup() is called.
-
- per-zone-per-cgroup LRU (cgroup's private LRU) is just guarded by
- pgdat->lru_lock, it has no lock of its own.
+ Page lock (PG_locked bit of page->flags)
+ mm->page_table_lock or split pte_lock
+ lock_page_memcg (memcg->move_lock)
+ mapping->i_pages lock
+ lruvec->lru_lock.
+
+Per-node-per-memcgroup LRU (cgroup's private LRU) is guarded by
+lruvec->lru_lock; PG_lru bit of page->flags is cleared before
+isolating a page from its LRU under lruvec->lru_lock.
2.7 Kernel Memory Extension (CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)
-----------------------------------------------
--- a/Documentation/trace/events-kmem.rst~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/Documentation/trace/events-kmem.rst
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ When pages are freed in batch, the also
Broadly speaking, pages are taken off the LRU lock in bulk and
freed in batch with a page list. Significant amounts of activity here could
indicate that the system is under memory pressure and can also indicate
-contention on the zone->lru_lock.
+contention on the lruvec->lru_lock.
4. Per-CPU Allocator Activity
=============================
--- a/Documentation/vm/unevictable-lru.rst~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/Documentation/vm/unevictable-lru.rst
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ reclaim in Linux. The problems have bee
memory x86_64 systems.
To illustrate this with an example, a non-NUMA x86_64 platform with 128GB of
-main memory will have over 32 million 4k pages in a single zone. When a large
+main memory will have over 32 million 4k pages in a single node. When a large
fraction of these pages are not evictable for any reason [see below], vmscan
will spend a lot of time scanning the LRU lists looking for the small fraction
of pages that are evictable. This can result in a situation where all CPUs are
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ unevictable, either by definition or by
The Unevictable Page List
-------------------------
-The Unevictable LRU infrastructure consists of an additional, per-zone, LRU list
+The Unevictable LRU infrastructure consists of an additional, per-node, LRU list
called the "unevictable" list and an associated page flag, PG_unevictable, to
indicate that the page is being managed on the unevictable list.
@@ -84,15 +84,9 @@ The unevictable list does not differenti
swap-backed pages. This differentiation is only important while the pages are,
in fact, evictable.
-The unevictable list benefits from the "arrayification" of the per-zone LRU
+The unevictable list benefits from the "arrayification" of the per-node LRU
lists and statistics originally proposed and posted by Christoph Lameter.
-The unevictable list does not use the LRU pagevec mechanism. Rather,
-unevictable pages are placed directly on the page's zone's unevictable list
-under the zone lru_lock. This allows us to prevent the stranding of pages on
-the unevictable list when one task has the page isolated from the LRU and other
-tasks are changing the "evictability" state of the page.
-
Memory Control Group Interaction
--------------------------------
@@ -101,8 +95,8 @@ The unevictable LRU facility interacts w
memory controller; see Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst] by extending the
lru_list enum.
-The memory controller data structure automatically gets a per-zone unevictable
-list as a result of the "arrayification" of the per-zone LRU lists (one per
+The memory controller data structure automatically gets a per-node unevictable
+list as a result of the "arrayification" of the per-node LRU lists (one per
lru_list enum element). The memory controller tracks the movement of pages to
and from the unevictable list.
@@ -196,7 +190,7 @@ for the sake of expediency, to leave a u
active/inactive LRU lists for vmscan to deal with. vmscan checks for such
pages in all of the shrink_{active|inactive|page}_list() functions and will
"cull" such pages that it encounters: that is, it diverts those pages to the
-unevictable list for the zone being scanned.
+unevictable list for the node being scanned.
There may be situations where a page is mapped into a VM_LOCKED VMA, but the
page is not marked as PG_mlocked. Such pages will make it all the way to
@@ -328,7 +322,7 @@ If the page was NOT already mlocked, mlo
page from the LRU, as it is likely on the appropriate active or inactive list
at that time. If the isolate_lru_page() succeeds, mlock_vma_page() will put
back the page - by calling putback_lru_page() - which will notice that the page
-is now mlocked and divert the page to the zone's unevictable list. If
+is now mlocked and divert the page to the node's unevictable list. If
mlock_vma_page() is unable to isolate the page from the LRU, vmscan will handle
it later if and when it attempts to reclaim the page.
@@ -603,7 +597,7 @@ Some examples of these unevictable pages
unevictable list in mlock_vma_page().
shrink_inactive_list() also diverts any unevictable pages that it finds on the
-inactive lists to the appropriate zone's unevictable list.
+inactive lists to the appropriate node's unevictable list.
shrink_inactive_list() should only see SHM_LOCK'd pages that became SHM_LOCK'd
after shrink_active_list() had moved them to the inactive list, or pages mapped
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct page {
struct { /* Page cache and anonymous pages */
/**
* @lru: Pageout list, eg. active_list protected by
- * pgdat->lru_lock. Sometimes used as a generic list
+ * lruvec->lru_lock. Sometimes used as a generic list
* by the page owner.
*/
struct list_head lru;
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -113,8 +113,7 @@ static inline bool free_area_empty(struc
struct pglist_data;
/*
- * zone->lock and the zone lru_lock are two of the hottest locks in the kernel.
- * So add a wild amount of padding here to ensure that they fall into separate
+ * Add a wild amount of padding here to ensure datas fall into separate
* cachelines. There are very few zone structures in the machine, so space
* consumption is not a concern here.
*/
--- a/mm/filemap.c~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/mm/filemap.c
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@
* ->swap_lock (try_to_unmap_one)
* ->private_lock (try_to_unmap_one)
* ->i_pages lock (try_to_unmap_one)
- * ->pgdat->lru_lock (follow_page->mark_page_accessed)
- * ->pgdat->lru_lock (check_pte_range->isolate_lru_page)
+ * ->lruvec->lru_lock (follow_page->mark_page_accessed)
+ * ->lruvec->lru_lock (check_pte_range->isolate_lru_page)
* ->private_lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty)
* ->i_pages lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty)
* bdi.wb->list_lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty)
--- a/mm/rmap.c~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/mm/rmap.c
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@
* hugetlb_fault_mutex (hugetlbfs specific page fault mutex)
* anon_vma->rwsem
* mm->page_table_lock or pte_lock
- * pgdat->lru_lock (in mark_page_accessed, isolate_lru_page)
* swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get)
* mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others)
* mapping->private_lock (in __set_page_dirty_buffers)
- * mem_cgroup_{begin,end}_page_stat (memcg->move_lock)
+ * lock_page_memcg move_lock (in __set_page_dirty_buffers)
* i_pages lock (widely used)
+ * lruvec->lru_lock (in lock_page_lruvec_irq)
* inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty)
* bdi.wb->list_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty)
* sb_lock (within inode_lock in fs/fs-writeback.c)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-lru-revise-the-comments-of-lru_lock
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1613,14 +1613,16 @@ static __always_inline void update_lru_s
}
/**
- * pgdat->lru_lock is heavily contended. Some of the functions that
+ * Isolating page from the lruvec to fill in @dst list by nr_to_scan times.
+ *
+ * lruvec->lru_lock is heavily contended. Some of the functions that
* shrink the lists perform better by taking out a batch of pages
* and working on them outside the LRU lock.
*
* For pagecache intensive workloads, this function is the hottest
* spot in the kernel (apart from copy_*_user functions).
*
- * Appropriate locks must be held before calling this function.
+ * Lru_lock must be held before calling this function.
*
* @nr_to_scan: The number of eligible pages to look through on the list.
* @lruvec: The LRU vector to pull pages from.
@@ -1814,25 +1816,11 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct pgli
}
/*
- * This moves pages from @list to corresponding LRU list.
- *
- * We move them the other way if the page is referenced by one or more
- * processes, from rmap.
- *
- * If the pages are mostly unmapped, the processing is fast and it is
- * appropriate to hold zone_lru_lock across the whole operation. But if
- * the pages are mapped, the processing is slow (page_referenced()) so we
- * should drop zone_lru_lock around each page. It's impossible to balance
- * this, so instead we remove the pages from the LRU while processing them.
- * It is safe to rely on PG_active against the non-LRU pages in here because
- * nobody will play with that bit on a non-LRU page.
- *
- * The downside is that we have to touch page->_refcount against each page.
- * But we had to alter page->flags anyway.
+ * move_pages_to_lru() moves pages from private @list to appropriate LRU list.
+ * On return, @list is reused as a list of pages to be freed by the caller.
*
* Returns the number of pages moved to the given lruvec.
*/
-
static unsigned noinline_for_stack move_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct list_head *list)
{
@@ -2010,6 +1998,23 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
return nr_reclaimed;
}
+/*
+ * shrink_active_list() moves pages from the active LRU to the inactive LRU.
+ *
+ * We move them the other way if the page is referenced by one or more
+ * processes.
+ *
+ * If the pages are mostly unmapped, the processing is fast and it is
+ * appropriate to hold lru_lock across the whole operation. But if
+ * the pages are mapped, the processing is slow (page_referenced()), so
+ * we should drop lru_lock around each page. It's impossible to balance
+ * this, so instead we remove the pages from the LRU while processing them.
+ * It is safe to rely on PG_active against the non-LRU pages in here because
+ * nobody will play with that bit on a non-LRU page.
+ *
+ * The downside is that we have to touch page->_refcount against each page.
+ * But we had to alter page->flags anyway.
+ */
static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct scan_control *sc,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@xxxxxxxxxx are
