The patch titled
Subject: mm, slub: use kmem_cache_debug_flags() in deactivate_slab()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-slub-use-kmem_cache_debug_flags-in-deactivate_slab.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, slub: use kmem_cache_debug_flags() in deactivate_slab()
Commit 9cf7a1118365 ("mm/slub: make add_full() condition more explicit")
replaced an unnecessarily generic kmem_cache_debug(s) check with an
explicit check of SLAB_STORE_USER and #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.
We can achieve the same specific check with the recently added
kmem_cache_debug_flags() which removes the #ifdef and restores the
no-branch-overhead benefit of static key check when slub debugging is not
enabled.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3ef24214-38c7-1238-8296-88caf7f48ab6@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Abel Wu <wuyun.wu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slub.c~mm-slub-use-kmem_cache_debug_flags-in-deactivate_slab
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -2245,8 +2245,7 @@ redo:
}
} else {
m = M_FULL;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
- if ((s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
+ if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
lock = 1;
/*
* This also ensures that the scanning of full
@@ -2255,7 +2254,6 @@ redo:
*/
spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
}
-#endif
}
if (l != m) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vbabka@xxxxxxx are
