[patch 057/200] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()

The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess.  So we could
replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with
else equally.  Also drop the comment which doesn't really explain much.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201012131607.10656-1-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-eliminate-redundant-check-in-__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -623,14 +623,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded
 		if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
 			rightmost = false;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
-		 * limit by the same amount
-		 */
-		else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+		} else {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (rightmost)
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux