[to-be-updated] mmoom_kill-fix-the-comment-of-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/oom_kill.c: fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mmoom_kill-fix-the-comment-of-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/oom_kill.c: fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()

Fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs().  It just checks whether
nr_unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than user memory.

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: remove incorrect kerneldoc token]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200926041526.GA179745@rlk
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/oom_kill.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mmoom_kill-fix-the-comment-of-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct t
 }
 
 /*
- * Print out unreclaimble slabs info when unreclaimable slabs amount is greater
- * than all user memory (LRU pages)
+ * Check whether unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than
+ * all user memory(LRU pages).
  */
 static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void)
 {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from sh_def@xxxxxxx are

mmslab_common-use-list_for_each_entry-in-dump_unreclaimable_slab.patch
mm-hugetlbc-just-use-put_page_testzero-instead-of-page_count.patch
acctc-use-elif-instead-of-end-and-elif.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux