The patch titled
Subject: mm/oom_kill.c: fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mmoom_kill-fix-the-comment-of-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/oom_kill.c: fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()
Fix the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(). It just checks whether
nr_unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than user memory.
[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: remove incorrect kerneldoc token]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200926041526.GA179745@rlk
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mmoom_kill-fix-the-comment-of-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct t
}
/*
- * Print out unreclaimble slabs info when unreclaimable slabs amount is greater
- * than all user memory (LRU pages)
+ * Check whether unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than
+ * all user memory(LRU pages).
*/
static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void)
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sh_def@xxxxxxx are
mmslab_common-use-list_for_each_entry-in-dump_unreclaimable_slab.patch
mm-hugetlbc-just-use-put_page_testzero-instead-of-page_count.patch
acctc-use-elif-instead-of-end-and-elif.patch
