The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_counter: correct the obsolete func name in the comment of page_counter_try_charge()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_counter-correct-the-obsolete-func-name-in-the-comment-of-page_counter_try_charge.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/page_counter: correct the obsolete func name in the comment of page_counter_try_charge()
Since commit bbec2e15170a ("mm: rename page_counter's count/limit into
usage/max"), page_counter_limit() is renamed to page_counter_set_max().
So replace page_counter_limit with page_counter_set_max in comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917113629.14382-1-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_counter.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/page_counter.c~mm-page_counter-correct-the-obsolete-func-name-in-the-comment-of-page_counter_try_charge
+++ a/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
*
* The atomic_long_add_return() implies a full memory
* barrier between incrementing the count and reading
- * the limit. When racing with page_counter_limit(),
+ * the limit. When racing with page_counter_set_max(),
* we either see the new limit or the setter sees the
* counter has changed and retries.
*/
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-vmstat-use-helper-macro-abs.patch
mm-fix-some-broken-comments.patch
mm-use-helper-function-put_write_access.patch
percpu_counter-use-helper-macro-abs.patch
mm-migrate-avoid-possible-unnecessary-process-right-check-in-kernel_move_pages.patch
