[patch 086/181] mm/page_counter: correct the obsolete func name in the comment of page_counter_try_charge()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/page_counter: correct the obsolete func name in the comment of page_counter_try_charge()

Since commit bbec2e15170a ("mm: rename page_counter's count/limit into
usage/max"), page_counter_limit() is renamed to page_counter_set_max().
So replace page_counter_limit with page_counter_set_max in comment.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917113629.14382-1-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/page_counter.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/page_counter.c~mm-page_counter-correct-the-obsolete-func-name-in-the-comment-of-page_counter_try_charge
+++ a/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
 		 *
 		 * The atomic_long_add_return() implies a full memory
 		 * barrier between incrementing the count and reading
-		 * the limit.  When racing with page_counter_limit(),
+		 * the limit.  When racing with page_counter_set_max(),
 		 * we either see the new limit or the setter sees the
 		 * counter has changed and retries.
 		 */
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux