The patch titled
Subject: lib/test_bitmap.c: add test for bitmap_cut()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
bitmap-add-test-for-bitmap_cut.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/test_bitmap.c: add test for bitmap_cut()
Inspired by an original patch from Yury Norov: introduce a test for
bitmap_cut() that also makes sure functionality is as described for
partially overlapping src and dst.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5fc45e6bbd4fa837cd9577f8a0c1d639df90a4ce.1592155364.git.sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/test_bitmap.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c~bitmap-add-test-for-bitmap_cut
+++ a/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -610,6 +610,63 @@ static void __init test_for_each_set_clu
expect_eq_clump8(start, CLUMP_EXP_NUMBITS, clump_exp, &clump);
}
+struct test_bitmap_cut {
+ unsigned int first;
+ unsigned int cut;
+ unsigned int nbits;
+ unsigned long in[4];
+ unsigned long expected[4];
+};
+
+static struct test_bitmap_cut test_cut[] = {
+ { 0, 0, 8, { 0x0000000aUL, }, { 0x0000000aUL, }, },
+ { 0, 0, 32, { 0xdadadeadUL, }, { 0xdadadeadUL, }, },
+ { 0, 3, 8, { 0x000000aaUL, }, { 0x00000015UL, }, },
+ { 3, 3, 8, { 0x000000aaUL, }, { 0x00000012UL, }, },
+ { 0, 1, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x52d2d2d2UL, }, },
+ { 0, 8, 32, { 0xdeadc0deUL, }, { 0x00deadc0UL, }, },
+ { 1, 1, 32, { 0x5a5a5a5aUL, }, { 0x2d2d2d2cUL, }, },
+ { 0, 15, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x00014b4bUL, }, },
+ { 0, 16, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0000a5a5UL, }, },
+ { 15, 15, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x000125a5UL, }, },
+ { 15, 16, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0000a5a5UL, }, },
+ { 16, 15, 32, { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, }, { 0x0001a5a5UL, }, },
+
+ { BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_LONG,
+ { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
+ { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
+ },
+ { 1, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, BITS_PER_LONG,
+ { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0xa5a5a5a5UL, },
+ { 0x00000001UL, 0x00000001UL, },
+ },
+
+ { 0, BITS_PER_LONG * 2, BITS_PER_LONG * 2 + 1,
+ { 0xa5a5a5a5UL, 0x00000001UL, 0x00000001UL, 0x00000001UL },
+ { 0x00000001UL, },
+ },
+ { 16, BITS_PER_LONG * 2 + 1, BITS_PER_LONG * 2 + 1 + 16,
+ { 0x0000ffffUL, 0x5a5a5a5aUL, 0x5a5a5a5aUL, 0x5a5a5a5aUL },
+ { 0x2d2dffffUL, },
+ },
+};
+
+static void __init test_bitmap_cut(void)
+{
+ unsigned long b[5], *in = &b[1], *out = &b[0]; /* Partial overlap */
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cut); i++) {
+ struct test_bitmap_cut *t = &test_cut[i];
+
+ memcpy(in, t->in, sizeof(t->in));
+
+ bitmap_cut(out, in, t->first, t->cut, t->nbits);
+
+ expect_eq_bitmap(t->expected, out, t->nbits);
+ }
+}
+
static void __init selftest(void)
{
test_zero_clear();
@@ -623,6 +680,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
test_bitmap_parselist_user();
test_mem_optimisations();
test_for_each_set_clump8();
+ test_bitmap_cut();
}
KSTM_MODULE_LOADERS(test_bitmap);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx are
