[merged] mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: delete or fix duplicated words
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: delete or fix duplicated words

Drop the repeated word "them" and "that".
Change "the the" to "to the".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200801173822.14973-10-rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/page_alloc.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ retry:
 	/*
 	 * If an allocation failed after direct reclaim, it could be because
 	 * pages are pinned on the per-cpu lists or in high alloc reserves.
-	 * Shrink them them and try again
+	 * Shrink them and try again
 	 */
 	if (!page && !drained) {
 		unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, false);
@@ -6192,7 +6192,7 @@ static int zone_batchsize(struct zone *z
  * locking.
  *
  * Any new users of pcp->batch and pcp->high should ensure they can cope with
- * those fields changing asynchronously (acording the the above rule).
+ * those fields changing asynchronously (acording to the above rule).
  *
  * mutex_is_locked(&pcp_batch_high_lock) required when calling this function
  * outside of boot time (or some other assurance that no concurrent updaters
@@ -8203,7 +8203,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(con
  * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
  *
  * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to
- * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that that it
+ * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it
  * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently.
  *
  */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux