The patch titled Subject: mm: hugetlb: fix the name of hugetlb CMA has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-hugetlb-fix-the-name-of-hugetlb-cma.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm: hugetlb: fix the name of hugetlb CMA Once we enable CMA_DEBUGFS, we will get the below errors: directory 'cma-hugetlb' with parent 'cma' already present. We should have different names for different CMA areas. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616223131.33828-3-song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-the-name-of-hugetlb-cma +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -5707,12 +5707,14 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int orde reserved = 0; for_each_node_state(nid, N_ONLINE) { int res; + char name[20]; size = min(per_node, hugetlb_cma_size - reserved); size = round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE << order); + snprintf(name, 20, "hugetlb%d", nid); res = cma_declare_contiguous_nid(0, size, 0, PAGE_SIZE << order, - 0, false, "hugetlb", + 0, false, name, &hugetlb_cma[nid], nid); if (res) { pr_warn("hugetlb_cma: reservation failed: err %d, node %d", _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are