The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: fix unbalanced locking
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
ocfs2-fix-unbalanced-locking.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: fix unbalanced locking
Based on what fails, function can return with nfs_sync_rwlock either
locked or unlocked. That can not be right.
Always return with lock unlocked on error.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200724124443.GA28164@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 4cd9973f9ff6 ("ocfs2: avoid inode removal while nfsd is accessing it")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c~ocfs2-fix-unbalanced-locking
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -2871,9 +2871,15 @@ int ocfs2_nfs_sync_lock(struct ocfs2_sup
status = ocfs2_cluster_lock(osb, lockres, ex ? LKM_EXMODE : LKM_PRMODE,
0, 0);
- if (status < 0)
+ if (status < 0) {
mlog(ML_ERROR, "lock on nfs sync lock failed %d\n", status);
+ if (ex)
+ up_write(&osb->nfs_sync_rwlock);
+ else
+ up_read(&osb->nfs_sync_rwlock);
+ }
+
return status;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from pavel@xxxxxx are
