The patch titled
Subject: mm/arc: use general page fault accounting
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/arc: use general page fault accounting
Use the general page fault accounting by passing regs into
handle_mm_fault(). It naturally solve the issue of multiple page fault
accounting when page fault retry happened.
Fix PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS perf event manually for page fault retries,
by moving it before taking mmap_sem.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200707225021.200906-4-peterx@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arc/mm/fault.c | 18 +++---------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c~mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting
+++ a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ void do_page_fault(unsigned long address
if (write)
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
+ perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
retry:
mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ retry:
goto bad_area;
}
- fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, NULL);
+ fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, regs);
/* Quick path to respond to signals */
if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) {
@@ -155,22 +156,9 @@ bad_area:
* Major/minor page fault accounting
* (in case of retry we only land here once)
*/
- perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
-
- if (likely(!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
- if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR) {
- tsk->maj_flt++;
- perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ, 1,
- regs, address);
- } else {
- tsk->min_flt++;
- perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN, 1,
- regs, address);
- }
-
+ if (likely(!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)))
/* Normal return path: fault Handled Gracefully */
return;
- }
if (!user_mode(regs))
goto no_context;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from peterx@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-do-page-fault-accounting-in-handle_mm_fault.patch
mm-alpha-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arm-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arm64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-csky-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-ia64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-m68k-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-microblaze-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-mips-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-nds32-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-nios2-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-openrisc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-parisc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-powerpc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-riscv-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-s390-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sh-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sparc32-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sparc64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-x86-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-xtensa-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-clean-up-the-last-pieces-of-page-fault-accountings.patch
mm-gup-remove-task_struct-pointer-for-all-gup-code.patch
