The patch titled
Subject: mm/hexagon: use general page fault accounting
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/hexagon: use general page fault accounting
Use the general page fault accounting by passing regs into
handle_mm_fault(). It naturally solve the issue of multiple page fault
accounting when page fault retry happened.
Add the missing PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS perf events too. Note, the
other two perf events (PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_[MAJ|MIN]) were done in
handle_mm_fault().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200707225021.200906-8-peterx@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Brian Cain <bcain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/hexagon/mm/vm_fault.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/hexagon/mm/vm_fault.c~mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting
+++ a/arch/hexagon/mm/vm_fault.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/extable.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
/*
* Decode of hardware exception sends us to one of several
@@ -53,6 +54,8 @@ void do_page_fault(unsigned long address
if (user_mode(regs))
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
+
+ perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
retry:
mmap_read_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, address);
@@ -88,7 +91,7 @@ good_area:
break;
}
- fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, NULL);
+ fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, regs);
if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs))
return;
@@ -96,10 +99,6 @@ good_area:
/* The most common case -- we are done. */
if (likely(!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) {
- if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR)
- current->maj_flt++;
- else
- current->min_flt++;
if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
goto retry;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from peterx@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-do-page-fault-accounting-in-handle_mm_fault.patch
mm-alpha-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arm-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-arm64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-csky-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-hexagon-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-ia64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-m68k-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-microblaze-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-mips-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-nds32-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-nios2-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-openrisc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-parisc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-powerpc-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-riscv-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-s390-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sh-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sparc32-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-sparc64-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-x86-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-xtensa-use-general-page-fault-accounting.patch
mm-clean-up-the-last-pieces-of-page-fault-accountings.patch
mm-gup-remove-task_struct-pointer-for-all-gup-code.patch
