The patch titled
Subject: lib/test_lockup.c: make symbol 'test_works' static
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
lib-test_lockupc-make-symbol-test_works-static.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/lib-test_lockupc-make-symbol-test_works-static.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/lib-test_lockupc-make-symbol-test_works-static.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/test_lockup.c: make symbol 'test_works' static
Fix sparse build warning:
lib/test_lockup.c:403:1: warning:
symbol '__pcpu_scope_test_works' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200707112252.9047-1-weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/test_lockup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/lib/test_lockup.c~lib-test_lockupc-make-symbol-test_works-static
+++ a/lib/test_lockup.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void test_lockup(bool master)
test_unlock(master, true);
}
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, test_works);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, test_works);
static void test_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix.patch
lib-test_lockupc-make-symbol-test_works-static.patch
bits-add-tests-of-genmask-fix-2.patch
kcov-make-some-symbols-static.patch
