The patch titled
Subject: mm, slub: make function parse_slub_debug_flags() static
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, slub: make function parse_slub_debug_flags() static
Fix sparse build warning:
mm/slub.c:1267:6: warning:
symbol 'parse_slub_debug_flags' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200702150522.4940-1-weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/slub.c~mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ out:
*
* returns the start of next block if there's any, or NULL
*/
-char *
+static char *
parse_slub_debug_flags(char *str, slab_flags_t *flags, char **slabs, bool init)
{
bool higher_order_disable = false;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-slub-extend-slub_debug-syntax-for-multiple-blocks-fix.patch
