The patch titled
Subject: vmalloc: fix the owner argument for the new __vmalloc_node_range callers
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: vmalloc: fix the owner argument for the new __vmalloc_node_range callers
Fix the recently added new __vmalloc_node_range callers to pass the
correct values as the owner for display in /proc/vmallocinfo.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200627075649.2455097-1-hch@xxxxxx
Fixes: 800e26b81311 ("x86/hyperv: allocate the hypercall page with only read and execute bits")
Fixes: 10d5e97c1bf8 ("arm64: use PAGE_KERNEL_ROX directly in alloc_insn_page")
Fixes: 7a0e27b2a0ce ("mm: remove vmalloc_exec")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 3 ++-
kernel/module.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c~vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers
+++ a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
{
return __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, 1, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_ROX, VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS,
- NUMA_NO_NODE, __func__);
+ NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
/* arm kprobe: install breakpoint in text */
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c~vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers
+++ a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
@@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ void __init hyperv_init(void)
hv_hypercall_pg = __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, 1, VMALLOC_START,
VMALLOC_END, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_ROX,
- VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE, __func__);
+ VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
if (hv_hypercall_pg == NULL) {
wrmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, 0);
goto remove_cpuhp_state;
--- a/kernel/module.c~vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers
+++ a/kernel/module.c
@@ -2785,7 +2785,7 @@ void * __weak module_alloc(unsigned long
{
return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS,
- NUMA_NO_NODE, __func__);
+ NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
bool __weak module_init_section(const char *name)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hch@xxxxxx are
vmalloc-fix-the-owner-argument-for-the-new-__vmalloc_node_range-callers.patch
