The patch titled
Subject: kcov: check kcov_softirq in kcov_remote_stop()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
kcov-check-kcov_softirq-in-kcov_remote_stop.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kcov: check kcov_softirq in kcov_remote_stop()
kcov_remote_stop() should check that the corresponding kcov_remote_start()
actually found the specified remote handle and started collecting
coverage. This is done by checking the per thread kcov_softirq flag.
A particular failure scenario where this was observed involved a softirq
with a remote coverage collection section coming between check_kcov_mode()
and the access to t->kcov_area in __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(). In that
softirq kcov_remote_start() bailed out after kcov_remote_find() check, but
the matching kcov_remote_stop() didn't check if kcov_remote_start()
succeeded, and overwrote per thread kcov parameters with invalid (zero)
values.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fcd1cd16eac1d2c01a66befd8ea4afc6f8d09833.1591576806.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 5ff3b30ab57d ("kcov: collect coverage from interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/kcov.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/kcov.c~kcov-check-kcov_softirq-in-kcov_remote_stop
+++ a/kernel/kcov.c
@@ -427,7 +427,8 @@ void kcov_task_exit(struct task_struct *
* WARN_ON(!kcov->remote && kcov->t != t);
*
* For KCOV_REMOTE_ENABLE devices, the exiting task is either:
- * 2. A remote task between kcov_remote_start() and kcov_remote_stop().
+ *
+ * 1. A remote task between kcov_remote_start() and kcov_remote_stop().
* In this case we should print a warning right away, since a task
* shouldn't be exiting when it's in a kcov coverage collection
* section. Here t points to the task that is collecting remote
@@ -437,7 +438,7 @@ void kcov_task_exit(struct task_struct *
* WARN_ON(kcov->remote && kcov->t != t);
*
* 2. The task that created kcov exiting without calling KCOV_DISABLE,
- * and then again we can make sure that t->kcov->t == t:
+ * and then again we make sure that t->kcov->t == t:
* WARN_ON(kcov->remote && kcov->t != t);
*
* By combining all three checks into one we get:
@@ -764,7 +765,7 @@ static const struct file_operations kcov
* Internally, kcov_remote_start() looks up the kcov device associated with the
* provided handle, allocates an area for coverage collection, and saves the
* pointers to kcov and area into the current task_struct to allow coverage to
- * be collected via __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc()
+ * be collected via __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc().
* In turns kcov_remote_stop() clears those pointers from task_struct to stop
* collecting coverage and copies all collected coverage into the kcov area.
*/
@@ -972,16 +973,25 @@ void kcov_remote_stop(void)
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
- kcov = t->kcov;
- area = t->kcov_area;
- size = t->kcov_size;
- sequence = t->kcov_sequence;
-
+ /*
+ * When in softirq, check if the corresponding kcov_remote_start()
+ * actually found the remote handle and started collecting coverage.
+ */
+ if (in_serving_softirq() && !t->kcov_softirq) {
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ /* Make sure that kcov_softirq is only set when in softirq. */
if (WARN_ON(!in_serving_softirq() && t->kcov_softirq)) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
+ kcov = t->kcov;
+ area = t->kcov_area;
+ size = t->kcov_size;
+ sequence = t->kcov_sequence;
+
kcov_stop(t);
if (in_serving_softirq()) {
t->kcov_softirq = 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx are
