The patch titled Subject: selftests/vm/pkeys: test correct behaviour of pkey-0 has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was selftests-vm-pkeys-test-correct-behaviour-of-pkey-0.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: selftests/vm/pkeys: test correct behaviour of pkey-0 Ensure that pkey-0 is allocated on start and that it can be attached dynamically in various modes, without failures. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9b7c54a9b4261894fe0c7e884c70b87214ff8fbb.1585646528.git.sandipan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" <desnesn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c~selftests-vm-pkeys-test-correct-behaviour-of-pkey-0 +++ a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c @@ -964,6 +964,58 @@ __attribute__((noinline)) int read_ptr(i return *ptr; } +void test_pkey_alloc_free_attach_pkey0(int *ptr, u16 pkey) +{ + int i, err; + int max_nr_pkey_allocs; + int alloced_pkeys[NR_PKEYS]; + int nr_alloced = 0; + long size; + + pkey_assert(pkey_last_malloc_record); + size = pkey_last_malloc_record->size; + /* + * This is a bit of a hack. But mprotect() requires + * huge-page-aligned sizes when operating on hugetlbfs. + * So, make sure that we use something that's a multiple + * of a huge page when we can. + */ + if (size >= HPAGE_SIZE) + size = HPAGE_SIZE; + + /* allocate every possible key and make sure key-0 never got allocated */ + max_nr_pkey_allocs = NR_PKEYS; + for (i = 0; i < max_nr_pkey_allocs; i++) { + int new_pkey = alloc_pkey(); + pkey_assert(new_pkey != 0); + + if (new_pkey < 0) + break; + alloced_pkeys[nr_alloced++] = new_pkey; + } + /* free all the allocated keys */ + for (i = 0; i < nr_alloced; i++) { + int free_ret; + + if (!alloced_pkeys[i]) + continue; + free_ret = sys_pkey_free(alloced_pkeys[i]); + pkey_assert(!free_ret); + } + + /* attach key-0 in various modes */ + err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, PROT_READ, 0); + pkey_assert(!err); + err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, PROT_WRITE, 0); + pkey_assert(!err); + err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, PROT_EXEC, 0); + pkey_assert(!err); + err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 0); + pkey_assert(!err); + err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, 0); + pkey_assert(!err); +} + void test_read_of_write_disabled_region(int *ptr, u16 pkey) { int ptr_contents; @@ -1448,6 +1500,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey, test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args, test_pkey_alloc_exhaust, + test_pkey_alloc_free_attach_pkey0, }; void run_tests_once(void) _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx are