[merged] mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment

There is a typo in comment, fix it.
"nother" -> "another"

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200604185239.20765-1-jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/vmalloc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(cons
 	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
 	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
 	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
-	 * nother cpu's list.  schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
+	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
 	 */
 	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx are





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux