The patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment
There is a typo in comment, fix it.
"nother" -> "another"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200604185239.20765-1-jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(cons
* Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
* context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
* implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
- * nother cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
+ * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
*/
struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx are
mm-vmalloc-fix-a-typo-in-comment.patch
