[merged] mm-swapfilec-omit-a-duplicate-code-by-compare-tmp-and-max-first.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/swapfile.c: omit a duplicate code by compare tmp and max first
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-swapfilec-omit-a-duplicate-code-by-compare-tmp-and-max-first.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/swapfile.c: omit a duplicate code by compare tmp and max first

There are two duplicate code to handle the case when there is no available
swap entry.  To avoid this, we can compare tmp and max first and let the
second guard do its job.

No functional change is expected.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200421213824.8099-3-richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/swapfile.c |   18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/swapfile.c~mm-swapfilec-omit-a-duplicate-code-by-compare-tmp-and-max-first
+++ a/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -629,17 +629,15 @@ new_cluster:
 	tmp = cluster->next;
 	max = min_t(unsigned long, si->max,
 		    (cluster_next(&cluster->index) + 1) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
-	if (tmp >= max) {
-		cluster_set_null(&cluster->index);
-		goto new_cluster;
-	}
-	ci = lock_cluster(si, tmp);
-	while (tmp < max) {
-		if (!si->swap_map[tmp])
-			break;
-		tmp++;
+	if (tmp < max) {
+		ci = lock_cluster(si, tmp);
+		while (tmp < max) {
+			if (!si->swap_map[tmp])
+				break;
+			tmp++;
+		}
+		unlock_cluster(ci);
 	}
-	unlock_cluster(ci);
 	if (tmp >= max) {
 		cluster_set_null(&cluster->index);
 		goto new_cluster;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-page_allocc-bad_-is-not-necessary-when-pagehwpoison.patch
mm-page_allocc-bad_flags-is-not-necessary-for-bad_page.patch
mm-page_allocc-rename-free_pages_check_bad-to-check_free_page_bad.patch
mm-page_allocc-rename-free_pages_check-to-check_free_page.patch
mm-page_allocc-extract-check__page_bad-common-part-to-page_bad_reason.patch
mm-page_allocc-use-node_mask_none-in-build_zonelists.patch
mm-rename-gfpflags_to_migratetype-to-gfp_migratetype-for-same-convention.patch
mm-vmscanc-use-update_lru_size-in-update_lru_sizes.patch
bitops-simplify-get_count_order_long.patch
bitops-use-the-same-mechanism-for-get_count_order.patch
lib-make-a-test-module-with-get_count_order-long.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux