On Thu, 21 May 2020 20:23:52 -0700 Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for going through this to fix the conflicts. is your current > git tree exported somewhere, so that I could help fixing such > conflicts with a coccinelle run ? My tree changes a lot :( 658 patches so far this cycle, tons on them in MM. linux-next is probably the best way to get at it when it's in a reasonable shape. Perhaps you could keep an eye on linux-next, do the occasional grep send me any fixups for anything which I missed? > On an unrelated note, I wanted to ask about the status of "mm/mmap.c: > fix the adjusted length error", which I noticed is still in your tree. > The code there is correct, but changes an O(log N) algorithm into an > O(N) one, so I am somewhat concerned about it... It's completely stuck - I'm awaiting some sort of resolution. It seems that the bug is real - is there any alternative solution on offer?
