The patch titled
Subject: lib/flex_proportions.c: aging counts when fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-flex_proportionsc-aging-counts-when-fraction-smaller-than-max_frac-fprop_frac_base.patch
This patch was dropped because an alternative patch was merged
------------------------------------------------------
From: Tan Hu <tan.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/flex_proportions.c: aging counts when fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE
If the given type has fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE,
__fprop_inc_percpu_max should follow the design formula and aging fraction
too.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1588746088-38605-1-git-send-email-tan.hu@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Tan Hu <tan.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <xue.zhihong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <wang.liang82@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/flex_proportions.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/flex_proportions.c~lib-flex_proportionsc-aging-counts-when-fraction-smaller-than-max_frac-fprop_frac_base
+++ a/lib/flex_proportions.c
@@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop
if (numerator >
(((u64)denominator) * max_frac) >> FPROP_FRAC_SHIFT)
return;
- } else
- fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
- percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
- percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
+ }
+
+ __fprop_inc_percpu(p, pl);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from tan.hu@xxxxxxxxxx are
lib-flex_proportionsc-cleanup-__fprop_inc_percpu_max.patch
