The patch titled
Subject: kselftests: introduce new epoll60 testcase for catching lost wakeups
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
kselftests-introduce-new-epoll60-testcase-for-catching-lost-wakeups.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/kselftests-introduce-new-epoll60-testcase-for-catching-lost-wakeups.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/kselftests-introduce-new-epoll60-testcase-for-catching-lost-wakeups.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@xxxxxxx>
Subject: kselftests: introduce new epoll60 testcase for catching lost wakeups
This test case catches lost wake up introduced by:
339ddb53d373 ("fs/epoll: remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll")
The test is simple: we have 10 threads and 10 event fds. Each thread can
harvest only 1 event. 1 producer fires all 10 events at once and waits
that all 10 events will be observed by 10 threads.
In case of lost wakeup epoll_wait() will timeout and 0 will be returned.
Test case catches two sort of problems: forgotten wakeup on event, which
hits the ->ovflist list, this problem was fixed by:
5a2513239750 ("eventpoll: fix missing wakeup for ovflist in ep_poll_callback")
the other problem is when several sequential events hit the same waiting
thread, thus other waiters get no wakeups. Problem is fixed in the
following patch.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200430130326.1368509-1-rpenyaev@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiher <r@xxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c | 146 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 146 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c~kselftests-introduce-new-epoll60-testcase-for-catching-lost-wakeups
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <poll.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <assert.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sys/epoll.h>
@@ -3136,4 +3137,149 @@ TEST(epoll59)
close(ctx.sfd[0]);
}
+enum {
+ EPOLL60_EVENTS_NR = 10,
+};
+
+struct epoll60_ctx {
+ volatile int stopped;
+ int ready;
+ int waiters;
+ int epfd;
+ int evfd[EPOLL60_EVENTS_NR];
+};
+
+static void *epoll60_wait_thread(void *ctx_)
+{
+ struct epoll60_ctx *ctx = ctx_;
+ struct epoll_event e;
+ sigset_t sigmask;
+ uint64_t v;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Block SIGUSR1 */
+ sigemptyset(&sigmask);
+ sigaddset(&sigmask, SIGUSR1);
+ sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
+
+ /* Prepare empty mask for epoll_pwait() */
+ sigemptyset(&sigmask);
+
+ while (!ctx->stopped) {
+ /* Mark we are ready */
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&ctx->ready, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+
+ /* Start when all are ready */
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&ctx->ready, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) &&
+ !ctx->stopped);
+
+ /* Account this waiter */
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&ctx->waiters, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+
+ ret = epoll_pwait(ctx->epfd, &e, 1, 2000, &sigmask);
+ if (ret != 1) {
+ /* We expect only signal delivery on stop */
+ assert(ret < 0 && errno == EINTR && "Lost wakeup!\n");
+ assert(ctx->stopped);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ret = read(e.data.fd, &v, sizeof(v));
+ /* Since we are on ET mode, thus each thread gets its own fd. */
+ assert(ret == sizeof(v));
+
+ __atomic_fetch_sub(&ctx->waiters, 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long long msecs(void)
+{
+ struct timespec ts;
+ unsigned long long msecs;
+
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
+ msecs = ts.tv_sec * 1000ull;
+ msecs += ts.tv_nsec / 1000000ull;
+
+ return msecs;
+}
+
+static inline int count_waiters(struct epoll60_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ return __atomic_load_n(&ctx->waiters, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+}
+
+TEST(epoll60)
+{
+ struct epoll60_ctx ctx = { 0 };
+ pthread_t waiters[ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd)];
+ struct epoll_event e;
+ int i, n, ret;
+
+ signal(SIGUSR1, signal_handler);
+
+ ctx.epfd = epoll_create1(0);
+ ASSERT_GE(ctx.epfd, 0);
+
+ /* Create event fds */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd); i++) {
+ ctx.evfd[i] = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
+ ASSERT_GE(ctx.evfd[i], 0);
+
+ e.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET;
+ e.data.fd = ctx.evfd[i];
+ ASSERT_EQ(epoll_ctl(ctx.epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ctx.evfd[i], &e), 0);
+ }
+
+ /* Create waiter threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(waiters); i++)
+ ASSERT_EQ(pthread_create(&waiters[i], NULL,
+ epoll60_wait_thread, &ctx), 0);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 300; i++) {
+ uint64_t v = 1, ms;
+
+ /* Wait for all to be ready */
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&ctx.ready, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) !=
+ ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd))
+ ;
+
+ /* Steady, go */
+ __atomic_fetch_sub(&ctx.ready, ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd),
+ __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+
+ /* Wait all have gone to kernel */
+ while (count_waiters(&ctx) != ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd))
+ ;
+
+ /* 1ms should be enough to schedule away */
+ usleep(1000);
+
+ /* Quickly signal all handles at once */
+ for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx.evfd); n++) {
+ ret = write(ctx.evfd[n], &v, sizeof(v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, sizeof(v));
+ }
+
+ /* Busy loop for 1s and wait for all waiters to wake up */
+ ms = msecs();
+ while (count_waiters(&ctx) && msecs() < ms + 1000)
+ ;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(count_waiters(&ctx), 0);
+ }
+ ctx.stopped = 1;
+ /* Stop waiters */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(waiters); i++)
+ ret = pthread_kill(waiters[i], SIGUSR1);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(waiters); i++)
+ pthread_join(waiters[i], NULL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(waiters); i++)
+ close(ctx.evfd[i]);
+ close(ctx.epfd);
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from rpenyaev@xxxxxxx are
kselftests-introduce-new-epoll60-testcase-for-catching-lost-wakeups.patch
epoll-atomically-remove-wait-entry-on-wake-up.patch
