+ gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: gcov: gcc_3_4: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: gcov: gcc_3_4: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension
to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied.  As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302224501.GA14175@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/gcov/gcc_3_4.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/gcov/gcc_3_4.c~gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member
+++ a/kernel/gcov/gcc_3_4.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct gcov_info *gcov_info_head;
 struct gcov_fn_info {
 	unsigned int ident;
 	unsigned int checksum;
-	unsigned int n_ctrs[0];
+	unsigned int n_ctrs[];
 };
 
 /**
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct gcov_info {
 	unsigned int			n_functions;
 	const struct gcov_fn_info	*functions;
 	unsigned int			ctr_mask;
-	struct gcov_ctr_info		counts[0];
+	struct gcov_ctr_info		counts[];
 };
 
 /**
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct gcov_iterator {
 	unsigned int count;
 
 	int num_types;
-	struct type_info type_info[0];
+	struct type_info type_info[];
 };
 
 static struct gcov_fn_info *get_func(struct gcov_iterator *iter)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

lib-bch-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
lib-ts_bm-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
lib-ts_fsm-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
lib-ts_kmp-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
gcov-gcc_4_7-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch
gcov-gcc_3_4-replace-zero-length-array-with-flexible-array-member.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux