The patch titled
Subject: fs/pstore: pstore_ftrace_seq_next() should increase position index
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
pstore_ftrace_seq_next-should-increase-position-index.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs/pstore: pstore_ftrace_seq_next() should increase position index
If seq_file .next fucntion does not change position index, read after some
lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51376af5-e0f2-0ff2-d664-e932153b0665@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/pstore/inode.c~pstore_ftrace_seq_next-should-increase-position-index
+++ a/fs/pstore/inode.c
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ static void *pstore_ftrace_seq_next(stru
struct pstore_private *ps = s->private;
struct pstore_ftrace_seq_data *data = v;
+ (*pos)++;
data->off += REC_SIZE;
if (data->off + REC_SIZE > ps->total_size)
return NULL;
- (*pos)++;
return data;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
seq_read-info-message-about-buggy-next-functions.patch
gcov_seq_next-should-increase-position-index.patch
sysvipc_find_ipc-should-increase-position-index.patch
