+ mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: fix a addressing exception caused by huge_pte_offset()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Longpeng <longpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: fix a addressing exception caused by huge_pte_offset()

Our machine encountered a panic(addressing exception) after running for a
long time.  The calltrace is:

RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff9dff0587>]  [<ffffffff9dff0587>] hugetlb_fault+0x307/0xbe0
RSP: 0018:ffff9567fc27f808  EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: e800c03ff1258d48 RBX: ffffd3bb003b69c0 RCX: e800c03ff1258d48
RDX: 17ff3fc00eda72b7 RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI: e800c03ff1258d48
RBP: ffff9567fc27f8c8 R08: e800c03ff1258d48 R09: 0000000000000080
R10: ffffaba0704c22a8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff95c87b4b60d8
R13: 00005fff00000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9567face8074
FS:  00007fe2d9ffb700(0000) GS:ffff956900e40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffffd3bb003b69c0 CR3: 000000be67374000 CR4: 00000000003627e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff9df9b71b>] ? unlock_page+0x2b/0x30
 [<ffffffff9dff04a2>] ? hugetlb_fault+0x222/0xbe0
 [<ffffffff9dff1405>] follow_hugetlb_page+0x175/0x540
 [<ffffffff9e15b825>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x35/0x50
 [<ffffffff9dfc7230>] __get_user_pages+0x2a0/0x7e0
 [<ffffffff9dfc648d>] __get_user_pages_unlocked+0x15d/0x210
 [<ffffffffc068cfc5>] __gfn_to_pfn_memslot+0x3c5/0x460 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc06b28be>] try_async_pf+0x6e/0x2a0 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc06b4b41>] tdp_page_fault+0x151/0x2d0 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc075731c>] ? vmx_vcpu_run+0x2ec/0xc80 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc0757328>] ? vmx_vcpu_run+0x2f8/0xc80 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc06abc11>] kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x31/0x140 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc074d1ae>] handle_ept_violation+0x9e/0x170 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc075579c>] vmx_handle_exit+0x2bc/0xc70 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc074f1a0>] ? __vmx_complete_interrupts.part.73+0x80/0xd0 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc07574c0>] ? vmx_vcpu_run+0x490/0xc80 [kvm_intel]
 [<ffffffffc069f3be>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x7be/0x13a0 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc06cf53e>] ? kvm_check_async_pf_completion+0x8e/0xb0 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc06a6f90>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x330/0x490 [kvm]
 [<ffffffffc068d919>] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x309/0x6d0 [kvm]
 [<ffffffff9deaa8c2>] ? dequeue_signal+0x32/0x180
 [<ffffffff9deae34d>] ? do_sigtimedwait+0xcd/0x230
 [<ffffffff9e03aed0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3f0/0x540
 [<ffffffff9e03b0c1>] SyS_ioctl+0xa1/0xc0
 [<ffffffff9e53879b>] system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27

The kernel we used is older, but we think the latest kernel also has this
bug after digging into this problem.

For 1G hugepages, huge_pte_offset() wants to return NULL or pudp, but it
may return a wrong 'pmdp' if there is a race.  Please look at the
following code snippet:

    ...
    pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
    if (sz != PUD_SIZE && pud_none(*pud))
        return NULL;
    /* hugepage or swap? */
    if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))
        return (pte_t *)pud;

    pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
    if (sz != PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd))
        return NULL;
    /* hugepage or swap? */
    if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))
        return (pte_t *)pmd;
    ...

The following sequence would trigger this bug:
1. CPU0: sz = PUD_SIZE and *pud = 0 , continue
1. CPU0: "pud_huge(*pud)" is false
2. CPU1: calling hugetlb_no_page and set *pud to xxxx8e7(PRESENT)
3. CPU0: "!pud_present(*pud)" is false, continue
4. CPU0: pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr) and maybe return a wrong pmdp
However, we want CPU0 to return NULL or pudp.

We can avoid this race by reading the pud only once.  What's more, we also
use READ_ONCE to access the entries for safety (i.e. avoid the compilier
mischief)

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1582342427-230392-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4910,28 +4910,30 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct
 {
 	pgd_t *pgd;
 	p4d_t *p4d;
-	pud_t *pud;
-	pmd_t *pmd;
+	pud_t *pud, pud_entry;
+	pmd_t *pmd, pmd_entry;
 
 	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
-	if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+	if (!pgd_present(READ_ONCE(*pgd)))
 		return NULL;
 	p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
-	if (!p4d_present(*p4d))
+	if (!p4d_present(READ_ONCE(*p4d)))
 		return NULL;
 
 	pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
-	if (sz != PUD_SIZE && pud_none(*pud))
+	pud_entry = READ_ONCE(*pud);
+	if (sz != PUD_SIZE && pud_none(pud_entry))
 		return NULL;
 	/* hugepage or swap? */
-	if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))
+	if (pud_huge(pud_entry) || !pud_present(pud_entry))
 		return (pte_t *)pud;
 
 	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
-	if (sz != PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd))
+	pmd_entry = READ_ONCE(*pmd);
+	if (sz != PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(pmd_entry))
 		return NULL;
 	/* hugepage or swap? */
-	if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))
+	if (pmd_huge(pmd_entry) || !pmd_present(pmd_entry))
 		return (pte_t *)pmd;
 
 	return NULL;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from longpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-hugetlb-fix-a-addressing-exception-caused-by-huge_pte_offset.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux