+ mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/kmemleak.c: use address-of operator on section symbols
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/kmemleak.c: use address-of operator on section symbols

Clang warns:

These are not true arrays, they are linker defined symbols, which are just
addresses.  Using the address of operator silences the warning and does
not change the resulting assembly with either clang/ld.lld or gcc/ld
(tested with diff + objdump -Dr).

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/895
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220051551.44000-1-natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/kmemleak.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/kmemleak.c~mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols
+++ a/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1947,7 +1947,7 @@ void __init kmemleak_init(void)
 	create_object((unsigned long)__bss_start, __bss_stop - __bss_start,
 		      KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	/* only register .data..ro_after_init if not within .data */
-	if (__start_ro_after_init < _sdata || __end_ro_after_init > _edata)
+	if (&__start_ro_after_init < &_sdata || &__end_ro_after_init > &_edata)
 		create_object((unsigned long)__start_ro_after_init,
 			      __end_ro_after_init - __start_ro_after_init,
 			      KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-kmemleak-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch
kernel-extable-use-address-of-operator-on-section-symbols.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux