The patch titled
Subject: mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()
Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0.
Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-3-david@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++--
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++--------------
mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(in
#define MEMORY_OFFLINE 0x1
#define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
- int migratetype, int flags);
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+ int flags);
void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
int migratetype, int *num_movable);
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_noloc
if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
return false;
- return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
+ return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
MEMORY_OFFLINE);
}
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -8180,17 +8180,15 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(con
/*
* This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not.
- * If @count is not zero, it is okay to include less @count unmovable pages
*
* PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
* MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
* check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
* race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
*/
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
- int migratetype, int flags)
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+ int flags)
{
- unsigned long found;
unsigned long iter = 0;
unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
const char *reason = "unmovable page";
@@ -8216,13 +8214,11 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo
goto unmovable;
}
- for (found = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
- unsigned long check = pfn + iter;
-
- if (!pfn_valid_within(check))
+ for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
+ if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter))
continue;
- page = pfn_to_page(check);
+ page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
if (PageReserved(page))
goto unmovable;
@@ -8271,11 +8267,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo
if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
continue;
- if (__PageMovable(page))
+ if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
continue;
- if (!PageLRU(page))
- found++;
/*
* If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
* it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
@@ -8289,8 +8283,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo
* is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel
* page at boot.
*/
- if (found > count)
- goto unmovable;
+ goto unmovable;
}
return false;
unmovable:
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struc
* FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
* We just check MOVABLE pages.
*/
- if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
+ if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
unsigned long nr_pages;
int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-fix-uninitialized-memmaps-on-a-partially-populated-last-section.patch
fs-proc-pagec-allow-inspection-of-last-section-and-fix-end-detection.patch
mm-initialize-memmap-of-unavailable-memory-directly.patch
mm-page_alloc-fix-and-rework-pfn-handling-in-memmap_init_zone.patch
mm-factor-out-next_present_section_nr.patch
drivers-base-memoryc-cache-memory-blocks-in-xarray-to-accelerate-lookup-fix.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-poison-memmap-in-remove_pfn_range_from_zone.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-we-always-have-a-zone-in-find_smallestbiggest_section_pfn.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-dont-check-for-all-holes-in-shrink_zone_span.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-drop-local-variables-in-shrink_zone_span.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-cleanup-__remove_pages.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-drop-valid_start-valid_end-from-test_pages_in_a_zone.patch
