The patch titled
Subject: init/main.c: use __initdata instead of __initconst
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
init-fixed-an-error-caused-by-using-__initdata-instead-of-__initconst.patch
This patch was dropped because it had testing failures
------------------------------------------------------
From: Carlos Guerrero Alvarez <carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: init/main.c: use __initdata instead of __initconst
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200106020217.13234-1-carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Carlos Guerrero Alvarez <carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
init/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/init/main.c~init-fixed-an-error-caused-by-using-__initdata-instead-of-__initconst
+++ a/init/main.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static initcall_entry_t *initcall_levels
};
/* Keep these in sync with initcalls in include/linux/init.h */
-static const char *initcall_level_names[] __initdata = {
+static const char *initcall_level_names[] __initconst = {
"pure",
"core",
"postcore",
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from carlosteniswarrior@xxxxxxxxx are
