The patch titled
Subject: fs/nsfs.c: include headers for missing declarations
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
fs-nsfsc-include-headers-for-missing-declarations.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-nsfsc-include-headers-for-missing-declarations.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fs-nsfsc-include-headers-for-missing-declarations.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs/nsfs.c: include headers for missing declarations
Include linux/proc_fs.h and fs/internal.h to address the following
'sparse' warnings:
fs/nsfs.c:41:32: warning: symbol 'ns_dentry_operations' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/nsfs.c:145:5: warning: symbol 'open_related_ns' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191209234822.156179-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nsfs.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nsfs.c~fs-nsfsc-include-headers-for-missing-declarations
+++ a/fs/nsfs.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/proc_ns.h>
#include <linux/magic.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
@@ -11,6 +12,8 @@
#include <linux/nsfs.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include "internal.h"
+
static struct vfsmount *nsfs_mnt;
static long ns_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx are
fs-direct-ioc-include-fs-internalh-for-missing-prototype.patch
fs-nsfsc-include-headers-for-missing-declarations.patch
fs-namespacec-make-to_mnt_ns-static.patch
