The patch titled
Subject: lib/test_bitmap: name EXP_BYTES properly
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-test_bitmap-name-exp_bytes-properly.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/test_bitmap: name EXP_BYTES properly
EXP_BYTES has been wrongly named. It's a size of the exp array in bits.
While here, go ahead and rename to EXP1_IN_BITS to avoid double renaming
when exp will be renamed to exp1 in the next patch
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022172922.61232-4-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/test_bitmap.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c~lib-test_bitmap-name-exp_bytes-properly
+++ a/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -374,17 +374,17 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_parselist
__test_bitmap_parselist(1);
}
-#define EXP_BYTES (sizeof(exp) * 8)
+#define EXP1_IN_BITS (sizeof(exp) * 8)
static void __init test_bitmap_arr32(void)
{
unsigned int nbits, next_bit;
- u32 arr[sizeof(exp) / 4];
- DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap2, EXP_BYTES);
+ u32 arr[EXP1_IN_BITS / 32];
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap2, EXP1_IN_BITS);
memset(arr, 0xa5, sizeof(arr));
- for (nbits = 0; nbits < EXP_BYTES; ++nbits) {
+ for (nbits = 0; nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS; ++nbits) {
bitmap_to_arr32(arr, exp, nbits);
bitmap_from_arr32(bmap2, arr, nbits);
expect_eq_bitmap(bmap2, exp, nbits);
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_arr32(voi
" tail is not safely cleared: %d\n",
nbits, next_bit);
- if (nbits < EXP_BYTES - 32)
+ if (nbits < EXP1_IN_BITS - 32)
expect_eq_uint(arr[DIV_ROUND_UP(nbits, 32)],
0xa5a5a5a5);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
