[merged] mm-vmscan-split-shrink_node-into-node-part-and-memcgs-part.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm: vmscan: split shrink_node() into node part and memcgs part
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-vmscan-split-shrink_node-into-node-part-and-memcgs-part.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: vmscan: split shrink_node() into node part and memcgs part

This function is getting long and unwieldy, split out the memcg bits.

The updated shrink_node() handles the generic (node) reclaim aspects:
  - global vmpressure notifications
  - writeback and congestion throttling
  - reclaim/compaction management
  - kswapd giving up on unreclaimable nodes

It then calls a new shrink_node_memcgs() which handles cgroup specifics:
  - the cgroup tree traversal
  - memory.low considerations
  - per-cgroup slab shrinking callbacks
  - per-cgroup vmpressure notifications

[hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx: rename "root" to "target_memcg", per Roman]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191025143640.GA386981@xxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022144803.302233-8-hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-split-shrink_node-into-node-part-and-memcgs-part
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2722,26 +2722,18 @@ static bool pgdat_memcg_congested(pg_dat
 		(memcg && memcg_congested(pgdat, memcg));
 }
 
-static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
-	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
-	struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
-	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
-	bool reclaimable = false;
+	struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-again:
-	memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr));
 
-	nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
-	nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
-	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, NULL);
+	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, NULL);
 	do {
 		struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
 		unsigned long reclaimed;
 		unsigned long scanned;
 
-		switch (mem_cgroup_protected(root, memcg)) {
+		switch (mem_cgroup_protected(target_memcg, memcg)) {
 		case MEMCG_PROT_MIN:
 			/*
 			 * Hard protection.
@@ -2785,7 +2777,23 @@ again:
 			   sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
 			   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
 
-	} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, NULL)));
+	} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, memcg, NULL)));
+}
+
+static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
+	struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
+	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
+	bool reclaimable = false;
+
+again:
+	memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr));
+
+	nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
+	nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
+
+	shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
 
 	if (reclaim_state) {
 		sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
@@ -2793,7 +2801,7 @@ again:
 	}
 
 	/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
-	vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
+	vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, target_memcg, true,
 		   sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
 		   sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
 
@@ -2849,7 +2857,7 @@ again:
 	 */
 	if (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && writeback_throttling_sane(sc) &&
 	    sc->nr.dirty && sc->nr.dirty == sc->nr.congested)
-		set_memcg_congestion(pgdat, root, true);
+		set_memcg_congestion(pgdat, target_memcg, true);
 
 	/*
 	 * Stall direct reclaim for IO completions if underlying BDIs
@@ -2858,7 +2866,8 @@ again:
 	 * the LRU too quickly.
 	 */
 	if (!sc->hibernation_mode && !current_is_kswapd() &&
-	    current_may_throttle() && pgdat_memcg_congested(pgdat, root))
+	    current_may_throttle() &&
+	    pgdat_memcg_congested(pgdat, target_memcg))
 		wait_iff_congested(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
 
 	if (should_continue_reclaim(pgdat, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx are