+ mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array.patch added to -mm tree

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm, memcg: clean up reclaim iter array
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, memcg: clean up reclaim iter array

The mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie is only used in memcg softlimit reclaim now,
and the priority of the reclaim is always 0.  We don't need to define the
iter in struct mem_cgroup_per_node as an array any more.  That could make
the code more clear and save some space.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1569897728-1686-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    3 +--
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   11 +++--------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection {
 
 struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie {
 	pg_data_t *pgdat;
-	int priority;
 	unsigned int generation;
 };
 
@@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
 
 	unsigned long		lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];
 
-	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter	iter[DEF_PRIORITY + 1];
+	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter	iter;
 
 	struct memcg_shrinker_map __rcu	*shrinker_map;
 
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struc
 		struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
 
 		mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(root, reclaim->pgdat->node_id);
-		iter = &mz->iter[reclaim->priority];
+		iter = &mz->iter;
 
 		if (prev && reclaim->generation != iter->generation)
 			goto out_unlock;
@@ -1152,15 +1152,11 @@ static void __invalidate_reclaim_iterato
 	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter *iter;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
 	int nid;
-	int i;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(from, nid);
-		for (i = 0; i <= DEF_PRIORITY; i++) {
-			iter = &mz->iter[i];
-			cmpxchg(&iter->position,
-				dead_memcg, NULL);
-		}
+		iter = &mz->iter;
+		cmpxchg(&iter->position, dead_memcg, NULL);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1705,7 +1701,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(struc
 	unsigned long nr_scanned;
 	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
 		.pgdat = pgdat,
-		.priority = 0,
 	};
 
 	excess = soft_limit_excess(root_memcg);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-memcg-clean-up-reclaim-iter-array.patch
mm-vmscan-expose-cgroup_ino-for-memcg-reclaim-tracepoints.patch