The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: remove unused ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit() declaration
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
ocfs2-the-function-ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit-is-declared-but-not-implemented-and-called-so-as-to-be-removed.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@xxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: remove unused ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit() declaration
ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit() is declared but not implemented. Also perform a
minor cleanup in ocfs2_link_credits()
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/71604351584F6A4EBAE558C676F37CA4014FC208AC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: guozhonghua <guozhonghua@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/journal.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h~ocfs2-the-function-ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit-is-declared-but-not-implemented-and-called-so-as-to-be-removed
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h
@@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ static inline void ocfs2_ci_set_new(stru
void ocfs2_orphan_scan_init(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
void ocfs2_orphan_scan_start(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
void ocfs2_orphan_scan_stop(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
-void ocfs2_orphan_scan_exit(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
void ocfs2_complete_recovery(struct work_struct *work);
void ocfs2_wait_for_recovery(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
@@ -441,7 +440,7 @@ static inline int ocfs2_mknod_credits(st
* previous dirblock update in the free list */
static inline int ocfs2_link_credits(struct super_block *sb)
{
- return 2*OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS + 4 +
+ return 2 * OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS + 4 +
ocfs2_quota_trans_credits(sb);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from guozhonghua@xxxxxxx are
