+ mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm, oom: consider present pages for the node size
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, oom: consider present pages for the node size

constrained_alloc() calculates the size of the oom domain by using
node_spanned_pages which is incorrect because this is the full range of
the physical memory range that the numa node occupies rather than the
memory that backs that range which is represented by node_present_pages.

Sparsely populated nodes (e.g.  after memory hot remove or simply sparse
due to memory layout) can have really a large difference between the two. 
This shouldn't really cause any real user observable problems because the
oom calculates a ratio against totalpages and used memory cannot exceed
present pages but it is confusing and wrong from code point of view.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190829163443.899-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/oom_kill.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_a
 	    !nodes_subset(node_states[N_MEMORY], *oc->nodemask)) {
 		oc->totalpages = total_swap_pages;
 		for_each_node_mask(nid, *oc->nodemask)
-			oc->totalpages += node_spanned_pages(nid);
+			oc->totalpages += node_present_pages(nid);
 		return CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY;
 	}
 
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_a
 	if (cpuset_limited) {
 		oc->totalpages = total_swap_pages;
 		for_each_node_mask(nid, cpuset_current_mems_allowed)
-			oc->totalpages += node_spanned_pages(nid);
+			oc->totalpages += node_present_pages(nid);
 		return CONSTRAINT_CPUSET;
 	}
 	return CONSTRAINT_NONE;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are

mm-memcg-do-not-set-reclaim_state-on-soft-limit-reclaim.patch
mm-oom-consider-present-pages-for-the-node-size.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux