The patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: fix percpu free VM area search criteria
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmallocc-fix-percpu-free-vm-area-search-criteria.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: fix percpu free VM area search criteria
Recent changes to the vmalloc code by commit 68ad4a330433 ("mm/vmalloc.c:
keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation") can cause spurious percpu
allocation failures. These, in turn, can result in panic()s in the slub
code. One such possible panic was reported by Dave Hansen in following
link https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/19/939. Another related panic observed
is,
RIP: 0033:0x7f46f7441b9b
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x61/0x80
pcpu_alloc.cold.30+0x22/0x4f
mem_cgroup_css_alloc+0x110/0x650
cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x133/0x330
cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x500
kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x5a/0x90
vfs_mkdir+0x102/0x1b0
do_mkdirat+0x7d/0xf0
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
VMALLOC memory manager divides the entire VMALLOC space (VMALLOC_START to
VMALLOC_END) into multiple VM areas (struct vm_areas), and it mainly uses
two lists (vmap_area_list & free_vmap_area_list) to track the used and
free VM areas in VMALLOC space. And pcpu_get_vm_areas(offsets[], sizes[],
nr_vms, align) function is used for allocating congruent VM areas for
percpu memory allocator. In order to not conflict with VMALLOC users,
pcpu_get_vm_areas allocates VM areas near the end of the VMALLOC space.
So the search for free vm_area for the given requirement starts near
VMALLOC_END and moves upwards towards VMALLOC_START.
Prior to commit 68ad4a330433, the search for free vm_area in
pcpu_get_vm_areas() involves following two main steps.
Step 1:
Find a aligned "base" adress near VMALLOC_END.
va = free vm area near VMALLOC_END
Step 2:
Loop through number of requested vm_areas and check,
Step 2.1:
if (base < VMALLOC_START)
1. fail with error
Step 2.2:
// end is offsets[area] + sizes[area]
if (base + end > va->vm_end)
1. Move the base downwards and repeat Step 2
Step 2.3:
if (base + start < va->vm_start)
1. Move to previous free vm_area node, find aligned
base address and repeat Step 2
But Commit 68ad4a330433 removed Step 2.2 and modified Step 2.3 as below:
Step 2.3:
if (base + start < va->vm_start || base + end > va->vm_end)
1. Move to previous free vm_area node, find aligned
base address and repeat Step 2
Above change is the root cause of spurious percpu memory allocation
failures. For example, consider a case where a relatively large vm_area
(~ 30 TB) was ignored in free vm_area search because it did not pass the
base + end < vm->vm_end boundary check. Ignoring such large free
vm_area's would lead to not finding free vm_area within boundary of
VMALLOC_start to VMALLOC_END which in turn leads to allocation failures.
So modify the search algorithm to include Step 2.2.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190729232139.91131-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 68ad4a330433 ("mm/vmalloc.c: keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation")
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Cc: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmallocc-fix-percpu-free-vm-area-search-criteria
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3279,9 +3279,19 @@ retry:
goto overflow;
/*
+ * If required width exeeds current VA block, move
+ * base downwards and then recheck.
+ */
+ if (base + end > va->va_end) {
+ base = pvm_determine_end_from_reverse(&va, align) - end;
+ term_area = area;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
* If this VA does not fit, move base downwards and recheck.
*/
- if (base + start < va->va_start || base + end > va->va_end) {
+ if (base + start < va->va_start) {
va = node_to_va(rb_prev(&va->rb_node));
base = pvm_determine_end_from_reverse(&va, align) - end;
term_area = area;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
