The patch titled
Subject: mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmevents before releasing memcg
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmevents-before-releasing-memcg.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmevents-before-releasing-memcg.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmevents-before-releasing-memcg.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmevents before releasing memcg
Similar to vmstats, percpu caching of local vmevents leads to an
accumulation of errors on non-leaf levels. This happens because some
leftovers may remain in percpu caches, so that they are never propagated
up by the cgroup tree and just disappear into nonexistence with on
releasing of the memory cgroup.
To fix this issue let's accumulate and propagate percpu vmevents values
before releasing the memory cgroup similar to what we're doing with
vmstats.
Since on cpu hotplug we do flush percpu vmstats anyway, we can iterate
only over online cpus.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812233754.2570543-1-guro@xxxxxx
Fixes: 42a300353577 ("mm: memcontrol: fix recursive statistics correctness & scalabilty")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmevents-before-releasing-memcg
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3336,6 +3336,25 @@ static void memcg_flush_percpu_vmstats(s
}
}
+static void memcg_flush_percpu_vmevents(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ unsigned long events[NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS];
+ struct mem_cgroup *mi;
+ int cpu, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++)
+ events[i] = 0;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++)
+ events[i] += raw_cpu_read(
+ memcg->vmstats_percpu->events[i]);
+
+ for (mi = memcg; mi; mi = parent_mem_cgroup(mi))
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++)
+ atomic_long_add(events[i], &mi->vmevents[i]);
+}
+
static void memcg_offline_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
@@ -4737,10 +4756,11 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem
int node;
/*
- * Flush percpu vmstats to guarantee the value correctness
+ * Flush percpu vmstats and vmevents to guarantee the value correctness
* on parent's and all ancestor levels.
*/
memcg_flush_percpu_vmstats(memcg, false);
+ memcg_flush_percpu_vmevents(memcg);
for_each_node(node)
free_mem_cgroup_per_node_info(memcg, node);
free_percpu(memcg->vmstats_percpu);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from guro@xxxxxx are
mm-workingset-fix-vmstat-counters-for-shadow-nodes.patch
mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmstats-before-releasing-memcg.patch
mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-slab-vmstats-on-kmem-offlining.patch
mm-memcontrol-flush-percpu-vmevents-before-releasing-memcg.patch
mm-memcontrol-switch-to-rcu-protection-in-drain_all_stock.patch
