The patch titled Subject: Revert "kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection" has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was revert-kmemleak-allow-to-coexist-with-fault-injection.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Revert "kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection" When running ltp's oom test with kmemleak enabled, the below warning was triggerred since kernel detects __GFP_NOFAIL & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is passed in: WARNING: CPU: 105 PID: 2138 at mm/page_alloc.c:4608 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50 Modules linked in: loop dax_pmem dax_pmem_core ip_tables x_tables xfs virtio_net net_failover virtio_blk failover ata_generic virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio libata CPU: 105 PID: 2138 Comm: oom01 Not tainted 5.2.0-next-20190710+ #7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50 ... kmemleak_alloc+0x4e/0xb0 kmem_cache_alloc+0x2a7/0x3e0 ? __kmalloc+0x1d6/0x470 ? ___might_sleep+0x9c/0x170 ? mempool_alloc+0x2b0/0x2b0 mempool_alloc_slab+0x2d/0x40 mempool_alloc+0x118/0x2b0 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mempool_resize+0x390/0x390 ? lock_downgrade+0x3c0/0x3c0 bio_alloc_bioset+0x19d/0x350 ? __swap_duplicate+0x161/0x240 ? bvec_alloc+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 get_swap_bio+0x80/0x230 ? __x64_sys_madvise+0x50/0x50 ? end_swap_bio_read+0x310/0x310 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x24e/0x300 ? bdev_write_page+0x55/0x130 __swap_writepage+0x5ff/0xb20 The mempool_alloc_slab() clears __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, however kmemleak has __GFP_NOFAIL set all the time due to d9570ee3bd1d4f2 ("kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection"). But, it doesn't make any sense to have __GFP_NOFAIL and ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM specified at the same time. According to the discussion on the mailing list, the commit should be reverted for short term solution. Catalin Marinas would follow up with a better solution for longer term. The failure rate of kmemleak metadata allocation may increase in some circumstances, but this should be expected side effect. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563299431-111710-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: d9570ee3bd1d4f2 ("kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection") Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/kmemleak.c~revert-kmemleak-allow-to-coexist-with-fault-injection +++ a/mm/kmemleak.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ /* GFP bitmask for kmemleak internal allocations */ #define gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp) (((gfp) & (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC)) | \ __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | \ - __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOFAIL) + __GFP_NOWARN) /* scanning area inside a memory block */ struct kmemleak_scan_area { _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are mm-mempolicy-make-the-behavior-consistent-when-mpol_mf_move-and-mpol_mf_strict-were-specified.patch mm-mempolicy-make-the-behavior-consistent-when-mpol_mf_move-and-mpol_mf_strict-were-specified-v4.patch mm-mempolicy-handle-vma-with-unmovable-pages-mapped-correctly-in-mbind.patch mm-mempolicy-handle-vma-with-unmovable-pages-mapped-correctly-in-mbind-v4.patch