The patch titled
Subject: coda: potential buffer overflow in coda_psdev_write()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
coda-potential-buffer-overflow-in-coda_psdev_write.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: coda: potential buffer overflow in coda_psdev_write()
Add checks to make sure the downcall message we got from the Coda cache
manager is large enough to contain the data it is supposed to have. i.e.
when we get a CODA_ZAPDIR we can access &out->coda_zapdir.CodaFid.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/894fb6b250add09e4e3935f14649f21284a5cb18.1558117389.git.jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fabian Frederick <fabf@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@xxxxxx>
Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/coda/psdev.c | 8 ++++++--
fs/coda/upcall.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/coda_psdev.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/coda/psdev.c~coda-potential-buffer-overflow-in-coda_psdev_write
+++ a/fs/coda/psdev.c
@@ -100,8 +100,12 @@ static ssize_t coda_psdev_write(struct f
ssize_t retval = 0, count = 0;
int error;
+ /* make sure there is enough to copy out the (opcode, unique) values */
+ if (nbytes < (2 * sizeof(u_int32_t)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Peek at the opcode, uniquefier */
- if (copy_from_user(&hdr, buf, 2 * sizeof(u_long)))
+ if (copy_from_user(&hdr, buf, 2 * sizeof(u_int32_t)))
return -EFAULT;
if (DOWNCALL(hdr.opcode)) {
@@ -127,7 +131,7 @@ static ssize_t coda_psdev_write(struct f
}
/* what downcall errors does Venus handle ? */
- error = coda_downcall(vcp, hdr.opcode, dcbuf);
+ error = coda_downcall(vcp, hdr.opcode, dcbuf, nbytes);
CODA_FREE(dcbuf, nbytes);
if (error) {
--- a/fs/coda/upcall.c~coda-potential-buffer-overflow-in-coda_psdev_write
+++ a/fs/coda/upcall.c
@@ -804,12 +804,44 @@ exit:
*
* CODA_REPLACE -- replace one CodaFid with another throughout the name cache */
-int coda_downcall(struct venus_comm *vcp, int opcode, union outputArgs *out)
+int coda_downcall(struct venus_comm *vcp, int opcode, union outputArgs *out,
+ size_t nbytes)
{
struct inode *inode = NULL;
struct CodaFid *fid = NULL, *newfid;
struct super_block *sb;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we have received enough data from the cache
+ * manager to populate the necessary fields in the buffer
+ */
+ switch (opcode) {
+ case CODA_PURGEUSER:
+ if (nbytes < sizeof(struct coda_purgeuser_out))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+
+ case CODA_ZAPDIR:
+ if (nbytes < sizeof(struct coda_zapdir_out))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+
+ case CODA_ZAPFILE:
+ if (nbytes < sizeof(struct coda_zapfile_out))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+
+ case CODA_PURGEFID:
+ if (nbytes < sizeof(struct coda_purgefid_out))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+
+ case CODA_REPLACE:
+ if (nbytes < sizeof(struct coda_replace_out))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
/* Handle invalidation requests. */
mutex_lock(&vcp->vc_mutex);
sb = vcp->vc_sb;
--- a/include/linux/coda_psdev.h~coda-potential-buffer-overflow-in-coda_psdev_write
+++ a/include/linux/coda_psdev.h
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ int venus_symlink(struct super_block *sb
int venus_access(struct super_block *sb, struct CodaFid *fid, int mask);
int venus_pioctl(struct super_block *sb, struct CodaFid *fid,
unsigned int cmd, struct PioctlData *data);
-int coda_downcall(struct venus_comm *vcp, int opcode, union outputArgs *out);
+int coda_downcall(struct venus_comm *vcp, int opcode, union outputArgs *out,
+ size_t nbytes);
int venus_fsync(struct super_block *sb, struct CodaFid *fid);
int venus_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *sfs);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx are
