The patch titled
Subject: fs/fat/file.c: issue flush after the writeback of FAT
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
fat-issue-flush-after-the-writeback-of-fat.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs/fat/file.c: issue flush after the writeback of FAT
fsync() needs to make sure the data & meta-data of file are persistent
after the return of fsync(), even when a power-failure occurs later. In
the case of fat-fs, the FAT belongs to the meta-data of file, so we need
to issue a flush after the writeback of FAT instead before.
Also bail out early when any stage of fsync fails.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190409030158.136316-1-houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fat/file.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fat/file.c~fat-issue-flush-after-the-writeback-of-fat
+++ a/fs/fat/file.c
@@ -193,12 +193,17 @@ static int fat_file_release(struct inode
int fat_file_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
{
struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
- int res, err;
+ int err;
+
+ err = __generic_file_fsync(filp, start, end, datasync);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- res = generic_file_fsync(filp, start, end, datasync);
err = sync_mapping_buffers(MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->fat_inode->i_mapping);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- return res ? res : err;
+ return blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx are
