- convert-cpu-hotplug-notifiers-to-use-raw_notifier-instead-of-blocking_notifier.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled

     Convert cpu hotplug notifiers to use raw_notifier instead of blocking_notifier

has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename is

     convert-cpu-hotplug-notifiers-to-use-raw_notifier-instead-of-blocking_notifier.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Convert cpu hotplug notifiers to use raw_notifier instead of blocking_notifier
From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

The use of blocking notifier by _cpu_up and _cpu_down in cpu.c has two
problem.

1/ An interaction with the workqueue notifier causes lockdep to spit a
   warning.

2/ A notifier could conceivable be added or removed while _cpu_up or
   _cpu_down are in process.  As each notifier is called twice (prepare
   then commit/abort) this could be unhealthy.

To fix to we simply take cpu_add_remove_lock while adding or removing
notifiers to/from the list.

This makes the 'blocking' usage unnecessary as all accesses to cpu_chain
are now protected by cpu_add_remove_lock.  So change "blocking" to "raw" in
all relevant places.  This fixes 1.

Credit: Andrew Morton
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx> (reporter)
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/cpu.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/cpu.c~convert-cpu-hotplug-notifiers-to-use-raw_notifier-instead-of-blocking_notifier kernel/cpu.c
--- a/kernel/cpu.c~convert-cpu-hotplug-notifiers-to-use-raw_notifier-instead-of-blocking_notifier
+++ a/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_add_remove_lock);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_bitmask_lock);
 
-static __cpuinitdata BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
+static __cpuinitdata RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
 
 /* If set, cpu_up and cpu_down will return -EBUSY and do nothing.
  * Should always be manipulated under cpu_add_remove_lock
@@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
 /* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
 int __cpuinit register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	int ret;
+	mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
@@ -77,7 +81,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
 
 void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
 
@@ -126,7 +132,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
+	err = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
 						(void *)(long)cpu);
 	if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
 		printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
@@ -146,7 +152,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 		/* CPU didn't die: tell everyone.  Can't complain. */
-		if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED,
+		if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED,
 				(void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
 			BUG();
 
@@ -169,7 +175,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 	put_cpu();
 
 	/* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain. */
-	if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD,
+	if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD,
 			(void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
 		BUG();
 
@@ -206,7 +212,7 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned in
 	if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
+	ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
 	if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
 		printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, cpu);
@@ -223,11 +229,11 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned in
 	BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu));
 
 	/* Now call notifier in preparation. */
-	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu);
+	raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu);
 
 out_notify:
 	if (ret != 0)
-		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
+		raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
 				CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu);
 
 	return ret;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from neilb@xxxxxxx are

origin.patch
lockdep-annotate-nfs-nfsd-in-kernel-sockets.patch
lockdep-annotate-nfs-nfsd-in-kernel-sockets-tidy.patch
remove-lock_key-approach-to-managing-nested-bd_mutex-locks.patch
simplify-some-aspects-of-bd_mutex-nesting.patch
use-mutex_lock_nested-for-bd_mutex-to-avoid-lockdep-warning.patch
avoid-lockdep-warning-in-md.patch
lockdep-annotate-nfsd4-recover-code.patch
md-conditionalize-some-code.patch
md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux