[patch 50/58] kernel/sched/: remove caller signal_pending branch predictions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kernel/sched/: remove caller signal_pending branch predictions

This is already done for us internally by the signal machinery.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116002713.8474-3-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/sched/core.c  |    2 +-
 kernel/sched/swait.c |    2 +-
 kernel/sched/wait.c  |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c~kernel-sched-remove-caller-signal_pending-branch-predictions
+++ a/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3416,7 +3416,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
 
 	switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
 	if (!preempt && prev->state) {
-		if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) {
+		if (signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)) {
 			prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
 		} else {
 			deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
--- a/kernel/sched/swait.c~kernel-sched-remove-caller-signal_pending-branch-predictions
+++ a/kernel/sched/swait.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ long prepare_to_swait_event(struct swait
 	long ret = 0;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
-	if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(state, current))) {
+	if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
 		/*
 		 * See prepare_to_wait_event(). TL;DR, subsequent swake_up_one()
 		 * must not see us.
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c~kernel-sched-remove-caller-signal_pending-branch-predictions
+++ a/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ long prepare_to_wait_event(struct wait_q
 	long ret = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&wq_head->lock, flags);
-	if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(state, current))) {
+	if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
 		/*
 		 * Exclusive waiter must not fail if it was selected by wakeup,
 		 * it should "consume" the condition we were waiting for.
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux