The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_owner: fix for deferred struct page init
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Subject: mm/page_owner: fix for deferred struct page init
When booting a system with "page_owner=on",
start_kernel
page_ext_init
invoke_init_callbacks
init_section_page_ext
init_page_owner
init_early_allocated_pages
init_zones_in_node
init_pages_in_zone
lookup_page_ext
page_to_nid
The issue here is that page_to_nid() will not work since some page
flags have no node information until later in page_alloc_init_late() due
to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. Hence, it could trigger an out-of-bounds
access with an invalid nid.
[ 8.666047] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/mm.h:1104:50
[ 8.672603] index 7 is out of range for type 'zone [5]'
Also, kernel will panic since flags were poisoned earlier with,
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y
CONFIG_NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS=n
start_kernel
setup_arch
pagetable_init
paging_init
sparse_init
sparse_init_nid
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw
Although later it tries to set page flags for pages in reserved bootmem
regions,
mm_init
mem_init
memblock_free_all
free_low_memory_core_early
reserve_bootmem_region
there could still have some freed pages from the page allocator but yet
to be initialized due to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. It have already been
dealt with a bit in page_ext_init().
* Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
*/
if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
continue;
However, it did not handle it well in init_pages_in_zone() which end up
calling page_to_nid().
[ 11.917212] page:ffffea0004200000 is uninitialized and poisoned
[ 11.917220] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffff
[ 11.921745] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffff
[ 11.924523] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
[ 11.926498] page_owner info is not active (free page?)
[ 12.329560] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:990!
[ 12.337632] RIP: 0010:init_page_owner+0x486/0x520
Since there is no other routines depend on page_ext_init() in
start_kernel(), just move it after page_alloc_init_late() to ensure that
there is no deferred pages need to de dealt with. If deselected
DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT, it is still better to call page_ext_init()
earlier, so page owner could catch more early page allocation call
sites. This gives us a good compromise between catching good and bad
call sites (See the v1 patch [1]) in case of DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181220060303.38686-1-cai@xxxxxx/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181220203156.43441-1-cai@xxxxxx
Fixes: fe53ca54270 (mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init)
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/init/main.c~mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init
+++ a/init/main.c
@@ -696,7 +696,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_k
initrd_start = 0;
}
#endif
+#ifndef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
page_ext_init();
+#endif
kmemleak_init();
setup_per_cpu_pageset();
numa_policy_init();
@@ -1143,6 +1145,9 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_
sched_init_smp();
page_alloc_init_late();
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
+ page_ext_init();
+#endif
do_basic_setup();
--- a/mm/page_ext.c~mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init
+++ a/mm/page_ext.c
@@ -399,9 +399,8 @@ void __init page_ext_init(void)
* -------------pfn-------------->
* N0 | N1 | N2 | N0 | N1 | N2|....
*
- * Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
*/
- if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
+ if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
continue;
if (init_section_page_ext(pfn, nid))
goto oom;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from cai@xxxxxx are
checkstackpl-dynamic-stack-growth-for-aarch64.patch
mm-page_owner-fix-for-deferred-struct-page-init.patch
