The patch titled Subject: mm, oom: reorganize the oom report in dump_header has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm, oom: reorganize the oom report in dump_header OOM report contains several sections. The first one is the allocation context that has triggered the OOM. Then we have cpuset context followed by the stack trace of the OOM path. The tird one is the OOM memory information. Followed by the current memory state of all system tasks. At last, we will show oom eligible tasks and the information about the chosen oom victim. One thing that makes parsing more awkward than necessary is that we do not have a single and easily parsable line about the oom context. This patch is reorganizing the oom report to 1) who invoked oom and what was the allocation request [ 515.902945] tuned invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x6200ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE), order=0, oom_score_adj=0 2) OOM stack trace [ 515.904273] CPU: 24 PID: 1809 Comm: tuned Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3+ #3 [ 515.905518] Hardware name: Inspur SA5212M4/YZMB-00370-107, BIOS 4.1.10 11/14/2016 [ 515.906821] Call Trace: [ 515.908062] dump_stack+0x5a/0x73 [ 515.909311] dump_header+0x55/0x28c [ 515.914260] oom_kill_process+0x2d8/0x300 [ 515.916708] out_of_memory+0x145/0x4a0 [ 515.917932] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x7d2/0xa16 [ 515.919157] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x277/0x290 [ 515.920367] filemap_fault+0x3d0/0x6c0 [ 515.921529] ? filemap_map_pages+0x2b8/0x420 [ 515.922709] ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40 [ext4] [ 515.923884] __do_fault+0x20/0x80 [ 515.925032] __handle_mm_fault+0xbc0/0xe80 [ 515.926195] handle_mm_fault+0xfa/0x210 [ 515.927357] __do_page_fault+0x233/0x4c0 [ 515.928506] do_page_fault+0x32/0x140 [ 515.929646] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30 [ 515.930770] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 3) OOM memory information [ 515.958093] Mem-Info: [ 515.959647] active_anon:26501758 inactive_anon:1179809 isolated_anon:0 active_file:4402672 inactive_file:483963 isolated_file:1344 unevictable:0 dirty:4886753 writeback:0 unstable:0 slab_reclaimable:148442 slab_unreclaimable:18741 mapped:1347 shmem:1347 pagetables:58669 bounce:0 free:88663 free_pcp:0 free_cma:0 ... 4) current memory state of all system tasks [ 516.079544] [ 744] 0 744 9211 1345 114688 82 0 systemd-journal [ 516.082034] [ 787] 0 787 31764 0 143360 92 0 lvmetad [ 516.084465] [ 792] 0 792 10930 1 110592 208 -1000 systemd-udevd [ 516.086865] [ 1199] 0 1199 13866 0 131072 112 -1000 auditd [ 516.089190] [ 1222] 0 1222 31990 1 110592 157 0 smartd [ 516.091477] [ 1225] 0 1225 4864 85 81920 43 0 irqbalance [ 516.093712] [ 1226] 0 1226 52612 0 258048 426 0 abrtd [ 516.112128] [ 1280] 0 1280 109774 55 299008 400 0 NetworkManager [ 516.113998] [ 1295] 0 1295 28817 37 69632 24 0 ksmtuned [ 516.144596] [ 10718] 0 10718 2622484 1721372 15998976 267219 0 panic [ 516.145792] [ 10719] 0 10719 2622484 1164767 9818112 53576 0 panic [ 516.146977] [ 10720] 0 10720 2622484 1174361 9904128 53709 0 panic [ 516.148163] [ 10721] 0 10721 2622484 1209070 10194944 54824 0 panic [ 516.149329] [ 10722] 0 10722 2622484 1745799 14774272 91138 0 panic 5) oom context (contrains and the chosen victim). oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0-1,task=panic,pid=10737,uid=0 An admin can easily get the full oom context at a single line which makes parsing much easier. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542799799-36184-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- --- a/include/linux/oom.h~reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header +++ a/include/linux/oom.h @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ struct notifier_block; struct mem_cgroup; struct task_struct; +enum oom_constraint { + CONSTRAINT_NONE, + CONSTRAINT_CPUSET, + CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY, + CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, +}; + /* * Details of the page allocation that triggered the oom killer that are used to * determine what should be killed. @@ -42,6 +49,9 @@ struct oom_control { unsigned long totalpages; struct task_struct *chosen; unsigned long chosen_points; + + /* Used to print the constraint info. */ + enum oom_constraint constraint; }; extern struct mutex oom_lock; --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c~reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header +++ a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -2666,9 +2666,9 @@ void cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(v rcu_read_lock(); cgrp = task_cs(current)->css.cgroup; - pr_info("%s cpuset=", current->comm); + pr_cont(",cpuset="); pr_cont_cgroup_name(cgrp); - pr_cont(" mems_allowed=%*pbl\n", + pr_cont(",mems_allowed=%*pbl", nodemask_pr_args(¤t->mems_allowed)); rcu_read_unlock(); --- a/mm/oom_kill.c~reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header +++ a/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -245,11 +245,11 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_st return points > 0 ? points : 1; } -enum oom_constraint { - CONSTRAINT_NONE, - CONSTRAINT_CPUSET, - CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY, - CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, +static const char * const oom_constraint_text[] = { + [CONSTRAINT_NONE] = "CONSTRAINT_NONE", + [CONSTRAINT_CPUSET] = "CONSTRAINT_CPUSET", + [CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY", + [CONSTRAINT_MEMCG] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMCG", }; /* @@ -428,16 +428,25 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct mem_cgroup rcu_read_unlock(); } +static void dump_oom_summary(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *victim) +{ + /* one line summary of the oom killer context. */ + pr_info("oom-kill:constraint=%s,nodemask=%*pbl", + oom_constraint_text[oc->constraint], + nodemask_pr_args(oc->nodemask)); + cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(); + pr_cont(",task=%s,pid=%d,uid=%d\n", victim->comm, victim->pid, + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(victim))); +} + static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p) { - pr_warn("%s invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=%#x(%pGg), nodemask=%*pbl, order=%d, oom_score_adj=%hd\n", - current->comm, oc->gfp_mask, &oc->gfp_mask, - nodemask_pr_args(oc->nodemask), oc->order, + pr_warn("%s invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=%#x(%pGg), order=%d, oom_score_adj=%hd\n", + current->comm, oc->gfp_mask, &oc->gfp_mask, oc->order, current->signal->oom_score_adj); if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && oc->order) pr_warn("COMPACTION is disabled!!!\n"); - cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(); dump_stack(); if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(oc->memcg, p); @@ -448,6 +457,8 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_contr } if (sysctl_oom_dump_tasks) dump_tasks(oc->memcg, oc->nodemask); + if (p) + dump_oom_summary(oc, p); } /* --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3704,13 +3704,13 @@ void warn_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask va_start(args, fmt); vaf.fmt = fmt; vaf.va = &args; - pr_warn("%s: %pV, mode:%#x(%pGg), nodemask=%*pbl\n", + pr_warn("%s: %pV, mode:%#x(%pGg), nodemask=%*pbl", current->comm, &vaf, gfp_mask, &gfp_mask, nodemask_pr_args(nodemask)); va_end(args); cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed(); - + pr_cont("\n"); dump_stack(); warn_alloc_show_mem(gfp_mask, nodemask); } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuzhoujian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are reorganize-the-oom-report-in-dump_header.patch add-oom-victims-memcg-to-the-oom-context-information.patch